Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St John The Baptist Church.jpg

File:St John The Baptist Church.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2014 at 00:25:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:St John The Baptist Church.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St John The Baptist Church.jpg

•  Info created by Mdbeckwith - uploaded by Mdbeckwith - nominated by Mdbeckwith -- Mdbeckwith (talk) 00:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mdbeckwith (talk) 00:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The nominator is asked to take a look at other church interior shots that are featured and decide if this meets that standard. I am certain you will find this is lacking on several technical matters not the least of which is the insufficient DoF. Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Agree with Saffron Blaze, although I don't think DoF is the issue here. f/9 at 10mm (16mm full frame equivalent) should be sufficient to get almost the entire frame in focus. But in looking at the image at 100%, I'm finding that there really isn't anywhere from the foreground all the way to the altar that is particularly sharp. In fact, the sharpest part of the image seems to be the far left edge which is rather strange. I've noticed a similar issue in previous images by the same photographer so I suspect the lens itself is poor/faulty. In addition, the HDR processing is not well done and there are resulting artifacts in the brightly lit areas of the pillars near the ceiling. Diliff (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose not very sharp -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 07:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nowhere really sharp, freaky tone mapping. -- Smial (talk) 10:35, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 09:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)