Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shopping Cidade São Paulo.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Shopping Cidade São Paulo.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2022 at 18:33:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:33, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Oppose I can't see why you would want to intrude on a bunch of people having a meal! Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
* Not absolutely ridiculousComment that prompted this response deleted, thanks Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Question What are the rules about privacy in this kind of situation in Brazil? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Info see Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Brazil: apparently, taking this picture already would have required consent from everyone depicted in it per Brazilian law. El Grafo (talk) 09:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I recommend putting this image
On hold until we figure out the rules about privacy for these kinds of images, per above. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 22:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- I asked permission from the mall administration before taking these photos. I wonder why nobody did not make any similar comments in this other FPC --Wilfredor (talk) 02:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't look at it, Wilfredo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- This was a question with no intention of scolding or anything, to others who did vote positively there but criticize here. :) --Wilfredor (talk) 01:07, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know, and that's a good point. I guess permission from the mall administration was sufficient under Brazilian law, yes? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment You have to distinguish between the personality right (that is, if you take a picture and there are identifiable people on it, you may need consent by those people) and the domiciliary right (that is, for taking pictures in a private property or even a state museum you may need the approval by its owner/administration). For the former, it doesn't matter where exactly the picture was taken; for the latter, it usually doesn't matter if there are any people depicted. I guess the "permission from the mall administration" is merely about the latter. Regards --A.Savin 19:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know, and that's a good point. I guess permission from the mall administration was sufficient under Brazilian law, yes? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I asked permission from the mall administration before taking these photos. I wonder why nobody did not make any similar comments in this other FPC --Wilfredor (talk) 02:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose In any case, I don't think the level of quality is sufficient for FP. There's CA, grain and some blur; the needed level of sharpness is not there.--Peulle (talk) 06:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle. — Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 22:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comments, I think that a FF camera could make the difference in this situation. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
