Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Chenonceau.JPG

File:Schloss Chenonceau.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 19:31:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Chenonceau.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Chenonceau.JPG

•  Info created by Wladyslaw Sojka - uploaded by Überraschungsbilder - nominated by Ikiwaner (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikiwaner (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --PaterMcFly (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC) (although it would have been nicer even if the sea was more flat)
•  Support -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 21:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice image, but we already have a very similar one File:Chateau de Chenonceau 2008E.jpg with not cut off castle.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
  • While the composition of that image admittedly is better, the quality is astonishingly bad for a FP. --NEURO ^⇌ 22:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Per NEUROtiker : the quality of that image is not even close to a FP. The composition of the current candidate, while arguably not optimal, is perfectly acceptable.

I tried to retouch it. --AM (talk) 12:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Valuable quality and composition. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support This one is much better than the existing one. --AngMoKio (talk) 09:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, the main subject is cut off. Sometimes it is all, but impossible not to cut off the main subject, but from the other image we know that in this particular situation it was possible to have the whole picture.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Mila. —kallerna™ 10:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 14:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Mbz1 --Leafnode✉ 18:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Composition. I see no excuse for cutting off part of the building. --Silversmith Hewwo 07:14, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Part of the building is cut off to improve the composition... And I was under the impression that kind of stuff doesn't matter for FP anyway. --Calibas (talk) 23:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Weak Oppose Quality is really good, but the crop have no excuse, sorry --Cesco77 (talk) 08:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad crop. --AM (talk) 13:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 01:07, 9 December 2009 (UTC)