Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santuario nacional.jpg/2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Santuario nacional.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2015 at 20:41:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

National Sanctuary of Aparecida, located in Aparecida, SP - Brazil.
  •  Info created by Valter Campanato/ABr - uploaded by Limongi - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral It is without doubt an interesting building, even though it could very well also be a railway station if not for the cross (and, well, the missing rails). The image is competently taken from an interesting vantage point, but the light is not very attractive and the size is quite small. --DXR (talk) 21:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per DXR. It’s really nice but since it’s a static subject and (I suppose) easy to take, there’s no excuse for the small resolution. From an FP I’d expect way more detail on the building here. Can’t be too difficult to shoot a panoramic of 4–6 frames here and stitch them to a hi-res photo of this view, which would get my immediate support. --Kreuzschnabel 03:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support--Emin • message 18:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Very good. I don't understand the concerns above. We can't expect everybody to take gigapixel-HDR-panorama-shots just because some frequent nominators create such pictures (which are very impressive, of course, please don't understand me wrong). For me saying a picture could have been taken even better is not in every case a valid reason to oppose. For me this picture is excellent as it is. --Code (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment I never said it had to be a panoramic, that was just a suggestion. I’d happily support a single shot of 12 or 16 megapixels here. But I expect an FPC of less than 4 mpix to be crisp sharp and well-detailed, while this one is still a bit soft at that small resolution. My oppose is a regretful one for the view is indeed nice. I just point out that any single shot with a lower-class DSLR and kit lens purchased after 2010 would have given a better result here. --Kreuzschnabel 06:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support nice view! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 11:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Santuario_nacional.jpg/2&oldid=149855556"