Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Petersburg Lakhta center 06.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Saint Petersburg Lakhta center 06.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2019 at 23:11:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
- Info created by Ad Meskens - uploaded by Ad Meskens - nominated by Kestreltail -- Kestreltail (talk) 23:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Kestreltail (talk) 23:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - I don't understand this nomination. The picture quality is very poor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality. --A.Savin 03:36, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is far below FP standards, maybe even QI--Boothsift 04:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Boothsift QI standsrds are the same like FP. Indeed a picture with lower quality could be FP (compensated with a big deal of wow) but not QI Poco2 06:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Theoretically, yes. But in reality? No. Having looked at some recent QI's, I can guarantee you not all of them would meet the quality standards for FP and visa versa. --Boothsift 06:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Boothsift: I can't speak for everybody but this is the way it should be. Of course there are more eyes here for a candidate than in QI, but still, we should all bear this in mind when reviewing QIs. Sorry, a bit off-topic here. Poco2 12:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Theoretically, yes. But in reality? No. Having looked at some recent QI's, I can guarantee you not all of them would meet the quality standards for FP and visa versa. --Boothsift 06:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Boothsift QI standsrds are the same like FP. Indeed a picture with lower quality could be FP (compensated with a big deal of wow) but not QI Poco2 06:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 08:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Obviously not FP. --A.Savin 13:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |