Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opera Garnier Grand Escalier.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2009 at 18:58:05

Info created and uploaded by Benh Lieu Song - nominated by Maedin
Support— Maedin\^talk 18:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral – I mean, it's fine, but just not original. To be perfectly honest, there're only so many "archisymmetrical" images I can support. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 12:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great picture but unsharp when viewed in 100% zoom.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 12:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good but not perfect. —kallerna™ 15:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - I don't see what's wrong with it personally. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting, useful and attractive photo.

Woops, sig added --KenWalker (talk) 05:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Muhammad (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support good work especially when considering the difficult light conditions. --AngMoKio (talk) 13:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support could be a little bigger for 12 images, but still rather exceptional --ianaré (talk) 13:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Info I may downsample images, but not by so much scale... without reason : if I remember (I lost the RAWs) the source pictures were taken at ISO 1600 and f/2.8. Hence a very bad quality when viewed at 100% (soft and very noisy). Leaving the picture unscaled down would certainly have not been seen well. For another reason, my picture of Eiffel Tower below is downsampled : I have a front focus problem on my lens... sadly... because the picture could have been twice as large. -- Benh (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sympathise with Benh as I too am accused of downsampling excessively with some of my images, and what many people don't realise is the difficulty in actually getting the image at all. It shouldn't matter what the theoretical resolution might be. If you're going to complain about downsampled panoramas, you might as well complain that Benh take a 100 segment mosaic instead of just 15. :-) Diliff (talk) 16:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Great shot and considering it was handheld, the symmetry and lack of stitching faults is impressive. Diliff (talk) 16:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karel (talk) 09:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Kjetil_r 18:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -S23678 (talk) 02:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. – Innv | d | s: 06:27, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! Did you notice which scale (8 storeys!) is shown in this picture? --Nati aus Sythen (talk) 19:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\^talk 11:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu