Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Niagara falls panorama.jpg

File:Niagara falls panorama.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2012 at 15:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Niagara falls panorama.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Niagara falls panorama.jpg

1774

513

445

203

5654

1296

American Falls

3356

473

2050

468

5654

1296

Horseshoe Falls

•  Info created by Sbittante - uploaded by Sbittante - nominated by Soerfm -- Soerfm (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Soerfm (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose not enought resolution and quality for a panorama of this type _→AzaToth 16:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad image composition --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunate stitch to the left of Horseshoe Falls. I like the view and composition though. DOF is good. Could use a little more resolution. --Slaunger (talk) 21:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose - The falls are beautiful but there are some technical issues. I also do not care the for the people in the lower left hand corner. Tiptoety ^talk 03:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Could not really find any bad stitching or other tech-issues.A foto of a tourist attraction w/o tourists seems incomplete. Resolution is sufficient. Kleuske (talk) 13:23, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
  • The problem are not the tourists but the bad embedding in this picture. The cropped curve of the river Niagara is bad too. --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:26, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
    • The guy in the red baseball hat is a bit annoying, i'll grant you that. Kleuske (talk) 10:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support per Kleuske. Tomer T (talk) 16:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
•  SupportAlborzagros (talk) 12:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Amoung other issues, why does the sky have different blue colored areas (kind of fluctuating)? --Yikrazuul (talk) 09:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)