Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neve Sha'anan - bus boarding platforms to Tel Aviv Central Bus Station.jpg 2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Neve Sha'anan - bus boarding platforms to Tel Aviv Central Bus Station.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2011 at 15:12:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Roi Boshi - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 15:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)- Info Nominated again after stitchting errors were fixed. Tomer T (talk) 15:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Oppose contre-jour, poor crop at bottom --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)- Oppose Unrealistic and useless curve of the building, I don't "understand" this picture, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- It's not an unrealistic curve. It's the actual structure of the building. Tomer T (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Nice --
aghith 17:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC) - Oppose -- Surely not nice. Sometimes the uglyness of the subject transmits interesting aesthetical and/or social messages, but I see nothing of that sort here. As for the distortion of the building, I agree with Jebulon. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- I think it could be a quality image, but the distortion of the building and the crop just don't convince me enough for FP support. --Ximonic (talk) 22:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Snaevar (talk) 23:30, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Subject and composition do not seem FP to me. --Murdockcrc (talk) 09:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 10:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment If the picture was geolocated, one could locate the building on a satellite view and that would settle the case of "is the building really curved or is it distorted". Unfortunately, I didn't manage to locate this building nearby the Bus Station... --MAURILBERT (discuter) 12:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- I've added geotag. I hope it can help. Tomer T (talk) 13:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose The backlight is too obvious. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 16:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - little illustrative value. --Спас Колев (talk) 12:27, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see how it can pass.
I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2011 (UTC) - Support Great composition, good quality! --Christoph Michels (talk) 08:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
