Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neeruti Eesjärv.jpg

File:Neeruti Eesjärv.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2013 at 08:12:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Neeruti Eesjärv.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neeruti Eesjärv.jpg

•  Info all by Ivar (talk) 08:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 08:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Magnificent scenery. --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral-- It is very good, but I do not consider it FP.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 10:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer (talk) 14:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral Needs quite some counter-clockwise rotationand is not that interesting as a subject in my opinion. --Julian H. (talk/files) 20:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

  Rotation corrected -> Neutral. Still can't see an FP motive. --Julian H. (talk/files) 19:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Oppose +1 on the rotation issue, plus that darkness at the right is a little distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Weak support Beautiful, save for the rotation issue: if that is corrected, consider my support as full. Michael Barera (talk) 03:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support only if the tilt is corrected. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:34, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Question Why do you think it's tilted? Trees are imho vertical. The lake bank on the right is just turning closer to the shooting point. We don't have here horisontal horizon. See this and this. --Ivar (talk) 06:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

  A good way to find out what is vertical is to compare the tip of a tree to its mirrored representation in the water. As the water is always horizontal, the line between an object and its reflection should be perfectly vertical. It isn't here. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:22, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

   Thank you., I'm gonna try to restich it agian. --Ivar (talk) 17:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Oppose Agree, its a pretty picture and nice reflections. But guess, we see so many of them. Nothing particularly striking or different here in this one to recommend FP label. Appologies --Dey.sandip (talk) 07:05, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

  This was taken in October 2012, before we got a deluge of such pictures. Is it really fair to blame the nominator for taking his time and thus failing to nominate it early enough? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Info New version uploaded. --Ivar (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Алый Король (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very good now --Moonik (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:46, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose too similar to an already featured picture. Two smaller issues are the wide crop at top and the underexposure on the right. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Compared to the other FP compositon and colors are visibly better, sharpness slightly inferior. Nonetheless I would prefer this one here. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Vamps (talk) 20:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
•  strong support--SteGrifo27 (tell me) 22:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Nice picture indeed, but basically the same idea as another picture already featured Spartan7W (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --cyrfaw (talk) 07:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Béria Lima ^msg 16:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas