Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Carillon, Canberra ACT.jpg

File:National Carillon, Canberra ACT.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2017 at 12:13:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:National Carillon, Canberra ACT.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Carillon, Canberra ACT.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info National Carillon, Canberra, reflecting in the waters of Lake Burley Griffin
•  Info all by me -- Thennicke (talk) 12:13, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 12:13, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- KennyOMG (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe a few too bright ...but ok. Nice composition. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Midday light, too bright, overall nothing special. Yann (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Yann. Beautiful composition but the lighting can be better. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't understand the "too bright" comments; nothing is overexposed, and this is indeed as the scene looked. I assume you have checked your monitors? -- Thennicke (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  I can only speak for myself, but to me "too bright" here refers to the quality of the light, not the quantity. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

• @King of Hearts: Thanks, that makes sense. -- Thennicke (talk) 08:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 18:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I see no problems with the light. It is a great view of an iconic building, with great detail and quality. It's a very wholesome view that puts into context the building's location on a shorefront, and gives a good idea of the building's size. Incredible shot. Philip Terry Graham (talk) 16:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture