Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Miomantis paykullii Luc Viatour.jpg

File:Miomantis paykullii Luc Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2009 at 12:13:40

•  Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 12:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 12:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —kallerna™ 13:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Question The composition is lovely. I don't want to play the wise guy, but isn't the mantis not a tad to overexposed and cold balanced, because normally it's green instead of mintish-white (glow-in-the-dark impression) which I think is a bit misleading for encyclopedical use. For photo art it may be working well. When turning the white balance to default it appears green, again but I agree that it's not banging that much as with the glow in the dark efx. EV or Photoart ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 13:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

müsste nur noch der Sensorfleck aus dem Flügel, dann gäbe es ein Pro für Richard Barz edit --Böhringer (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Bin mir nicht sicher ob ich den Edit nominieren soll. Du kannst das aber gerne machen, die Datei liegt noch auf meinem Server --Richard Bartz (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

C'est un spécimen jeune. Sa couleur était plus ou moins comme cela. Cela change évidement suivant que le ciel est couvert (plus froid) ou plein soleil (plus blanc) ou en fin de journée au soleil (plus chaud). Sorry to reply in French, but I am unable to explain reasoning in English --Luc Viatour (talk) 15:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Oui, d'accord. Si c'est une spécimen nouvelle, je ne pouvrais trouver des references. Pourtant une image très belle!  Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Peux-tu eliminer la macule du capteur, s'il te plais? Comme Böhringer a dit plus haut. --Richard Bartz (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Voilà c'est corrigé --Luc Viatour (talk) 05:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Stunning picture, as usual. →Diti the penguin — 17:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very sharp photo and a good composition. I think although that the insect thorax seems to exhibit a flared highlight. (Tiago Fioreze (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC))
• 鮮やかな色彩と奇抜ながらも調和のとれた構図を  Support -- Laitche (talk) 20:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX^talk  21:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Man On Mission (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support danke --Böhringer (talk) 09:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 15:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Incredibly sharp, lots of wow, amazing photography that we (as users of commons) should be proud to have as a featured picture. --Anonymous101 ^talk 17:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Leoboudv (talk) 06:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Winiar^✉ 09:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent shot. --libertad0 ॐ (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 05:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Estrilda (talk) 13:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Kuvaly (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support no question --Simonizer (talk) 19:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support: Very nice! I like how the simple composition works together with the subject. I would like Richard's edit even more. --Siebengang (talk) 13:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Mywood (talk) 09:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)