Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallorca - Dragonera.jpg

File:Mallorca - Dragonera.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2009 at 13:59:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mallorca - Dragonera.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallorca - Dragonera.jpg

•  Info created by imehling - uploaded by imehling - nominated by imehling -- Imehling (talk) 13:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Imehling (talk) 13:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Great view, but there's a lot of CA in the rocks and no geocode. -- H005 16:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose nothing outstanding --Leafnode✉ 07:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose - Really nice, but as mentioned above I don't think it's of a particularly extraordinary quality. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, the noise levels are too high for a day picture --S23678 (talk) 01:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Again I would disagree with the reason for excluding it from featured picture candidacy. There isn't a great deal of noise on the picture, certainly no more than one would expect. I think it is one of the strongest contenders, but that's only my humble opinion. Mtaylor848 (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
  • That is ok but then replace the FPX template as noted in the template otherwise the bot will autoclose this as "not featured". /Daniel78 (talk) 20:53, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Are you mixing clouds and noise again? --S23678 (talk) 21:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
    • If you deem the noise here inacceptable you'll have to decline virtually every landscape image here. This is rather low noise and certainly not a reason to FPX it. -- H005 21:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
      • I wanted to be more specific than just saying "low quality", and yet not give a laundry list of the defects I saw, so I went for the main quality issue : noise. But you are right, I realize that I should have given more meat to my reasons, since noise alone is not enough for FPX. --S23678 (talk) 23:26, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

 Imehling (talk) 17:44, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

• This discussion gets to stupid for me. Maybe S23678 should clean his screen.