Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:M777 Light Towed Howitzer 1.jpg

File:M777 Light Towed Howitzer 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2009 at 19:47:41

•  Info created by Jonathan Mallard (on Flickr) - uploaded by Andrew c - nominated by Yarnalgo -- Yarnalgo (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Yarnalgo (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm opposing this on grounds unrelated to the subject matter, though I'm sure there will be at least one or two who oppose it for being "military-glorifying propaganda" or some such related notion. My view from a quality perspective is that the whole image has a muddy, noisy feel to it, and I don't much like the composition, either. --Notyourbroom (talk) 20:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose lack of composition and war pics can't give me wow. I am not in general against war photos, if they document a war in a realistic way, cruel and senseless as they are, then I can support them. --AngMoKio (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support A rare high quality image from Afganistan. Of course the wars are cruel and horrible. Too bad that sometimes there's no other choice, but to fight the war.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - poor composition (Two cutoff figures on the right) and the lighting is not good - Peripitus (talk) 13:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sry, this one is much better. Needs editing (I'll try do something). —kallerna™ 13:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral Well, it's bit better now. —kallerna™ 13:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose As much as I enjoy military photography, I must concur with Peripitus and Notyourbroom. The photo is cluttered, the subject obscured and minimised and the lighting detracts from the quality. The current FP, as Kallerna pointed out, is superior. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 14:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Supportvery good picture.--CnrFallon (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Mywood (talk) 11:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)