Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral at dusk (reduced grain), corrected perspective.jpg

File:Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral at dusk (reduced grain), corrected perspective.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2010 at 07:15:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral at dusk (reduced grain), corrected perspective.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral at dusk (reduced grain), corrected perspective.jpg

•  Info created by Chowells - uploaded by Chowells - nominated by Patriot8790 -- патриот8790^{Say whatever you want} 07:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- патриот8790^{Say whatever you want} 07:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Cesco77 (talk) 10:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support, I think this is a very good shot of the subject. My only regret is that the altar and cross are almost hidden in darkness ; yet this is part of the design of the cathedral, and not a shortcoming of this picture. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Quality is not the best. A day shot would have shown better detail. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - ditto to Alvesgaspar - MPF (talk) 08:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I love it --Llorenzi (talk) 12:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Quality is more than good, for this picture featured in the english wikipedia. A day shot would not have shown better details, for example the very nice light through the stained glass windows above. --Jebulon (talk) 00:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - nice. Jonathunder (talk) 17:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - great atmosphere (which is what this image is about, IMO), good details and sharpness. — Yerpo ^Eh? 20:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. -- Laitche (talk) 21:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 12:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment No information template (I am considering to vote "oppose" for that reason). No creator templates for the architects (requires an analysis of each work done by each architect and finding out how many architects did the features that are seen on this view). Perhaps a creator template for the stained glass artist would not be superfluous either. Could it be possible to mention in simple words the location of the photographer (taken from South ? North ? West ? East? ) in addition to the Geotagging ? I can't find out the date when the pic was taken (was that 70 years ago ?). Where has the camera EXIF gone ? Or was it an argentic picture ? But it is a beautiful picture, if that's what you want to hear. Teofilo (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture