Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lünersee Saulakopf.jpg

File:Lünersee Saulakopf.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2011 at 21:10:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lünersee Saulakopf.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lünersee Saulakopf.jpg

•  Info created by alex.vonbun - uploaded by alex.vonbun - nominated by alex.vonbun -- alex.vonbun (talk) 21:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- alex.vonbun (talk) 21:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

  Drittelregel: etwas oben vom Himmel sollte noch abgeschnitten werden. So wirkt die Komposition unausgewogen. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose not as good as File:Lünersee vom Saulakopf 1.JPG which is already featured. --ELEKHH^T 01:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice -- Raghith (talk) 01:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Not as good as the current FP. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:26, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Is there any official rule saying that a current FP candidate has to be better than an already promoted image of the same subject? I agree that the aforementioned image is better than this candidate, but this one looks FP to me too. --Murdockcrc (talk) 09:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
  • "Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons." (my emphasis). It depends on how you interpret this: if the other image is the finest for this subject, than this one is not the finest IMO. It is also a question if is worth highlighting two (or more) very similar images of the same subject or not. --ELEKHH^T 10:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose composition not perfect, too dark + ack. Elekhh. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Elekhh. --Спас Колев (talk) 12:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)