Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jeune bouquetin.png

Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2009 at 09:54:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded by and nominated by Ymaup -- Ymaup (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ymaup (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why png format? That's not very bandwidth-friendly. Lycaon (talk) 10:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I actually tried to upload a jpg version, but it didn't work, and I didn't find why.... Ymaup (talk) 10:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMO not sharp enough. —kallerna™ 10:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose could be perhaps a little darker, have a little more contrast and a unsharp-mask could help, too; the composition is good --Mbdortmund (talk) 11:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Mbdortmund --George Chernilevsky (talk) 12:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. See also my comment here regarding multiple nominations of the same subject. -- JovanCormac 14:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
InfoI will nominate a better version of this one Ymaup (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Support for JPG, one is enough --ka ʁs tn 19:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
PNG is complete and utter nonsense for a picture like this. --Dschwen (talk) 01:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Out of focus. Tiptoety ^talk 05:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Yann (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yann (talk) 16:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
SupportThanks Yann!Ymaup (talk) 16:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ka ʁs tn 19:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose prefer the shot above, the river/road in the bg is messing up the composition. --Dschwen (talk) 01:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looks alright. Tiptoety ^talk 05:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --George Chernilevsky (talk) 06:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 11:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality not enough. —kallerna™ 15:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per kallerna. -- JovanCormac 16:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support the size of the image is almost 3 times bigger than required size. IMO the quality for this size is fine.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Almost there, but still per kallerna. Lycaon (talk) 20:59, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technical quality not sufficient. --NEUROtiker ^⇌ 09:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – per Lycaon --Ernie (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured.

Navigation menu