Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:IIT Machinery Hall.jpg

File:IIT Machinery Hall.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2011 at 22:50:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:IIT Machinery Hall.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:IIT Machinery Hall.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye -- Jovian Eye _talk 22:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jovian Eye _talk 22:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Raghith 06:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support It's so clean! Btw, flipping between the old and new versions was fun. Someone scooched their air conditioner out a bit, and the bridge height sign vanished, among other things. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 09:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Great. It's almost a Bernd & Hilla Becher picture, but in color... -- MJJR (talk) 20:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I also find it "clean". Not the most impressive picture out there, but a nice architecture pic taken from proper angle, nicely perspective fixed, and eye catching IMO. - Benh (talk) 21:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support sadly lacking sharpness at the borders but great composition and good light --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks technically very good, indeed, but is this kind of picture really the best "Commons" can offer ? I don't think so, sorry. --Jebulon (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral My eyes are a little disturbed by the very prominent perspective correction, I would even say that on the left side, it's a tiny bit too much. Perhaps, would it be better to undercorrect the perspective for a more "natural" look? Otherwise, no complaints whatsoever - colors, noise reduction, lens correction all well executed. Therefore, I would give my support if my suggestion is accepted. Hendric Stattmann (talk) 19:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment I have reworked the perspective and reduced it as per your comments. --Jovian Eye _talk 20:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
  • In the light of the successful improvement, now  Support. Hendric Stattmann (talk) 21:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think it is a very high quality shot of a nice building with good light and excellent colors. A very good QI so to say. But I am sorry I do not see anything really special about the composition or the photo itself, which make it stand out as being amongst the very best Commons has to offer, see, e.g., this FP of a building of the approximate same shape — it is in an entirely different league IMO (not that every building FP has to be so good, but it is a good reference of what FP is about). --Slaunger (talk) 21:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Jeb and Slaunger. W.S. 11:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- pro2 20:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Jeb and Slaunger.--Miguel Bugallo 00:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Vote added after end of voting period discarded. --Slaunger (talk) 18:42, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
  • I dont think your vote can be counted as the voting period is over. --Jovian Eye _talk 01:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Slaunger (talk) 18:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture