Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore MMK.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore MMK.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2010 at 12:56:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info c/u/n Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 12:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Muhammad (talk) 12:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose The image seems incomplete without seeing the left and right limits to the building. Snowmanradio (talk) 13:39, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- It is not possible to see anymore than this. There are trees to either side completely blocking the view. --Muhammad (talk) 14:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- blocking the building or blocking your view ? If the former, then it should be shown. --ianaré (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Blocking the view of the building --Muhammad (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- There are trees cut of on the left and right of the image. I would have thought that they are part of the view. Snowmanradio (talk) 20:30, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Blocking the view of the building --Muhammad (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- blocking the building or blocking your view ? If the former, then it should be shown. --ianaré (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- It is not possible to see anymore than this. There are trees to either side completely blocking the view. --Muhammad (talk) 14:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support - MPF (talk) 22:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Jafeluv (talk) 11:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Steven Walling 19:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Not sure how long the building is, but I think the crop should have been extend to include the entire building. Tiptoety talk 01:25, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- As I have mentioned before, it is impossible to include the entire building. The building is long and there are many other obstructions which block a wider view. This is the best possible view. You can confirm what I am saying by doing a google search and seeing for yourself --Muhammad (talk) 02:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- It would probably not have hurt to include the two trees left and right to provide for a more natural framing. --Dschwen (talk) 19:57, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- P.S.: What about this perspective? Still possible? --Dschwen (talk) 20:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Clearly, that is an aerial shot and a very old one from the looks of it. There is a fence built before the court and photographers are allowed to shoot from the oter side of the fence. In such a position, yes it is still impossible to capture any better. --Muhammad (talk) 00:36, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- This is not that clear to me. Unless you call a shot from a high ladder or a building an aerial shot. --Dschwen (talk) 14:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, either it is aerial or it has been taken from the Vidhana Soudha which is very unlikely. --Muhammad (talk) 14:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm not in the mood for lengthy discussions on completely obvious things: The shot was taken from below the roofline of the building. You can see no roof on it! Calling it an areal shot is ridiculous. EOD. --Dschwen (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Pardon my ridiculousness, I agree I was mistaken about the aerial part. But the picture is still a very old one taken before the fence was built. The only building opposite to the court is the Vidhana Soudha and I doubt I would be allowed to go in, let alone take pictures from there --Muhammad (talk) 15:59, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm not in the mood for lengthy discussions on completely obvious things: The shot was taken from below the roofline of the building. You can see no roof on it! Calling it an areal shot is ridiculous. EOD. --Dschwen (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, either it is aerial or it has been taken from the Vidhana Soudha which is very unlikely. --Muhammad (talk) 14:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- This is not that clear to me. Unless you call a shot from a high ladder or a building an aerial shot. --Dschwen (talk) 14:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Clearly, that is an aerial shot and a very old one from the looks of it. There is a fence built before the court and photographers are allowed to shoot from the oter side of the fence. In such a position, yes it is still impossible to capture any better. --Muhammad (talk) 00:36, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- As I have mentioned before, it is impossible to include the entire building. The building is long and there are many other obstructions which block a wider view. This is the best possible view. You can confirm what I am saying by doing a google search and seeing for yourself --Muhammad (talk) 02:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support--Avala (talk) 13:22, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Leafnode✉ 09:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, I don't like the crop. --mathias K 14:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Yes, it would be nice to see the whole building but maybe that is only possible from the air. Quality is ok, composition is probably the best possible and there is a touch of exoticism mixed up with the 'classical' shape of the building (the red) that catches the eye. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
