Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HDR Picture of WWII Spitfire Fighter Engine Testing MOD 45154465.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:HDR Picture of WWII Spitfire Fighter Engine Testing MOD 45154465.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2014 at 13:54:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by SAC Graham Taylor - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Chase me ladies -- Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 13:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 13:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)- Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Merops (talk) 08:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 16:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry photographers are humans and have the right to play and having a good time. But the result is (imo) maybe fun, eccentric and different but has no wow for me.--ArildV (talk) 19:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)- Support I think it carries the necessary uniqueness. Atsme☯Consult 16:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose It' a very good picture but I don't like to see these pop-art HDR colors on a WW2 plane. It's not the way these planes should be featured on a site like wikipedia. --Uberprutser (talk) 16:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment Except this isn't Wikipedia. I wish people would learn and draw the distinction when voting here. This is an art gallery not a museum archive. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per the first part of the comment of Ubersprutzer. I agree with the two first sentences of Saffron Blaze, but I strongly disagree with the third. 'Commons' is not an art gallery.--Jebulon (talk) 11:38, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support I've had a long discussion with myself about this. I'll spare you the details, but it turns out I'm unable to come to a "reasonable" conclusion. So I switched off my brain and made this a gut decision: it's an awesome picture after all. --El Grafo (talk) 20:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
