Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Greenwich Park Vista.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Greenwich Park Vista.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2010 at 21:20:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Pixel8 - uploaded by Pixel8 - nominated by Oddgear -- 86.20.84.197 21:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Support -- 86.20.84.197 21:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment No IP votes. Please login if you're different to Oddgear the nominator... --99of9 (talk) 11:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Oddgear (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Very tight crop at bottom. --MattiPaavola (talk) 23:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC)- Support Quite a few interesting structures. --Mbz1 (talk) 06:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The white balance appears to change in the sky above the chimneys. --99of9 (talk) 11:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Not too fond of the crop and the WB issue 99of9 pointed out. --Dschwen (talk) 16:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm a bit surprised... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, what was I thinking. At least I complained about the foreground crop back then as well :-). Plus that was a different project, so allow me some inconsistency! --Dschwen (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- "So I like, even if I had not circumcised the fore so strongly. Nice overview about the landscape, the colors are very appealing without the encyclopedic value of the image to minimize its impact." I sure hope that was Google Translate being funny :) --Dori - Talk 01:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Now that you mention it, maybe a Penis-vandal had temporarily replaced the image when I voted.. ;-) --Dschwen (talk) 01:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- "So I like, even if I had not circumcised the fore so strongly. Nice overview about the landscape, the colors are very appealing without the encyclopedic value of the image to minimize its impact." I sure hope that was Google Translate being funny :) --Dori - Talk 01:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, what was I thinking. At least I complained about the foreground crop back then as well :-). Plus that was a different project, so allow me some inconsistency! --Dschwen (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm a bit surprised... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --92.76.28.62 08:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Ugh, sorry. I forgot to log in. --MichaelBueker (talk) 08:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, per others. —kallerna™ 14:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Great picture. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Dori - Talk 01:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Neutral I don't care the bottom crop, but the white balance of the extreme right of the picture is really strange... --Phyrexian (talk) 21:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)- Oppose per 99of9. -- Avenue (talk) 09:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Phyrexian --Herby talk thyme 18:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
