Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Graz - Uhrenturm6.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Graz - Uhrenturm6.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2011 at 14:55:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 14:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 14:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)- Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:17, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support --alex.vonbun (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support Keine Frage --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Petritap (talk) 08:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Oppose This already has 8 supports? Seriously?? I hope I'm missing something, but there are huge aesthetic problems here. Big greyed out patches that have ugly joins to the non-greyed out patches. I'll mark some of the boundaries to help your eyes. This could be a stitching problem, or an interaction between the spotlights and the mist, but it's ugly no matter what it is. 99of9 (talk) 09:16, 23 February 2011 (UTC)- Oppose That grey is indeed disturbing, and the composition is not outstanding for me. Otherwise good detail. --ELEKHHT 11:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Per reasons above. Looks like if the masking job were unfinished. + need of some perspective correction : th pole and th dome in background right are leaning to the left) --Jebulon (talk) 11:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per 99of9 and others.. Ggia (talk) 16:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- I like the lighting and I can't find these grey spots.. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 04:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Especially the 'misty' stairs to the left of the tower are weird. W.S. 14:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Comment I can not see any spots derogating seriously this image. But I invite all reviewer to verify and make it better: all original RAW-images are downloadable here: ([1], [2], [3], [4], click at the green download-button after closing the pop-up-window) -- Wladyslaw (talk) 15:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Cropped version, for visual purposes only.
- Comment Uploaded a cropped version, where the annotated areas are marked into the picture. Hopefully that will help you to see the "greyed out patches".--Snaevar (talk) 11:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Please read carefully: I did say, that the spots are not derogating the image and not that I did not see them. The area you have marked is the area the spotlight shines and reflects very strong. This are not errors but the natural circumstances. --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Don´t shoot the messanger. If you do wan´t to argue about the "greyed out patches" do so to eather Jeublon, 99of9, Ggia or WS. Personally, I have never said that those patches are an issue, and this picture is for demonstrative purposes only. My opinion has nothing to do with it.--Snaevar (talk) 13:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I see it now. I'd noticed that before but it just looked like a shadowy area to me. I'm not quite sure what to think of it. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 03:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Please read carefully: I did say, that the spots are not derogating the image and not that I did not see them. The area you have marked is the area the spotlight shines and reflects very strong. This are not errors but the natural circumstances. --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support nice --Muhammad (talk) 11:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
