Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glaciar Davidson, Haines, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 55.jpg

File:Glaciar Davidson, Haines, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 55.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2018 at 08:36:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Glaciar Davidson, Haines, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 55.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glaciar Davidson, Haines, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 55.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Smial -- Smial (talk) 08:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like this image because of the very special lighting. -- Smial (talk) 08:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:55, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Agree, a nice one! :) Thank you Smial for the nom! --Poco² 11:21, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support For once, an image with grey sky and dirty subject adds to the value.--Peulle (talk) 12:54, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 13:32, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:57, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Agree, great lighting. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:08, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:53, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Would be great if brightened 2/3 stop or so but right now it's too dark for me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:24, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

  KoH I just checked it and 2/3 stop would be definitely too much, the atmosphere of the images would be essentially different. If Smial wants I can offer a alternative version. Poco² 07:11, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

   Comment Simple brightening wouldn't work. Perhaps slight S-curving? I don't think it's really necessary, but I've tried a minor rework. --Smial (talk) 11:41, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

  Perhaps we'll just have to agree to disagree then. In my opinion scenes sometimes do need to be brightened from what the eye sees; for example, I've found that the optimal time to photograph during the blue hour comes 5-10 minutes after the optimal time for viewing the scene with the naked eye, using a significantly longer exposure of course. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:25, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good as it is--Ermell (talk) 19:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support We not should change the natural light of this scene --The Photographer 23:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:48, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:10, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural