Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo in Cordoba.jpg

File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo in Cordoba.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 11:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo in Cordoba.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo in Cordoba.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
•  Info created by ElBute - uploaded by ElBute - nominated by ElBute -- ElBute (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- ElBute (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
• Mild  Support - Very good composition but very gray. Might look better as a black & white photo, as the lack of color would really bring out the excellent qualities of the variation of light and shadow and the overall composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC) - Now  Oppose in favor of the black & white version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:38, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Info I totally agree with you. I'm into artistic photography and I can tell you that this picture really works in B&W. But I didn't dare to turn it into B&W because I thought Commons users wouldn't be willing to miss colour information. --ElBute (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • We have featured other recently taken black & white photos before. You could create a black & white alternative and someone could put it up for a vote to see which version is more appreciated here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 00:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info B&W version, as suggested by Ikan Kekek. --ElBute (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --ElBute (talk) 08:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I prefer this version. INeverCry 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I prefer this version, too, and I will change my vote on the color photo to oppose if it becomes clear this alternative can get enough support for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Unusual B&W panorama. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Prefer this version. Good image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support and seven. --Hubertl 14:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry to break up the unanimity. Yes, the b&w version is better overall, but it is still oversharpened to me, perhaps to make up for using a wider aperture. Daniel Case (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose No seduction, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Info I'm sorry. This is the first time I create an alternative and it is featured. I do not know what to do now. What is the alternative parameter? --ElBute (talk) 06:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 00:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

The chosen alternative is: File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo (alt1).jpg