Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elictites no Floresta Branca.jpg

File:Elictites no Floresta Branca.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2016 at 13:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Elictites no Floresta Branca.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elictites no Floresta Branca.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
•  Info created and uploaded by JOSE HUMBERTO MATIAS DE PAULA - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
• Mild (see comment)  Support Oh yes. I've liked this pic since the first time I saw it. I'm terrified that she will breathe too hard or trip and break some of the formations! Sharp and good, BUT I think it is tilted since stalactites always grow straight down due to gravity (water drops are clearly visible at the end of the stalactites). Any chance that the creator could straighten it or at least comment on if my suspicion is right. w.carter-Talk 14:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Very good -- Spurzem (talk) 14:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral Amazing image quality, however, IMHO cut, tight and unnatural composition --The Photographer (talk) 21:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

@The Photographer: Why "unnatural composition"? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

IMhO the girl/boy has a forced pose of working, however, composition cut and tight is what make my vote neutral --The Photographer (talk) 21:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per The Photographer. Composition looks too tight, like she's too close to the formations. INeverCry 21:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Just to see how it looked, I did a slightly rotated version of the file, and it does not look as "tight" as in the tilted version where she seems to be leaning into the formations. Her proximity to the crystals also provides a good size/scale-thing. Let's hope the original editor can take a look at that and see if this is something to consider. w.carter-Talk 22:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

@W.carter: Thanks! Add as alternative. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose - I find both versions too crowded-looking with the person in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The person in the image may be wowed, but I'm not. Daniel Case (talk) 00:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Slightly rotated version, by W.carter. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:28, 25 July 2016 (UTC)