Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EC 135 Air Ambulance (Konflikty.pl).jpg

File:EC 135 Air Ambulance (Konflikty.pl).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2010 at 17:45:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:EC 135 Air Ambulance (Konflikty.pl).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EC 135 Air Ambulance (Konflikty.pl).jpg

•  Info created by Łukasz Golowanow & Maciek Hypś - retouched and nominated by Mmxx --   ■ MMXX  ^talk  17:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Abstain The original image have been nominated before and it didn't get featured. I just wanted to try again, this time without boat in the background! (sorry Airwolf, for removing that!)   ■ MMXX  ^talk  17:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support if nothing else for the excellent cloning job on removing the boat, almost impossible to see that it has been done - MPF (talk) 18:13, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, very good cloning job. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Yet a third time: great cloning job. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 18:41, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment As the co-author of this image I would like to say that a) I still believe the picture with the boat to be more aesthetically pleasing, but b) I understand that others might think otherwise, and c) I really think MMXX did a great retouching job. Still, d) I think a slight crop at the top might be beneficial since the contents of the image is now more bottom oriented. Wolf (talk) 22:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I liked the original elements, but not at that angle. The cloning is well done here, but it leaves a less interesting photo. Jonathunder (talk) 23:03, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jonathunder   • Richard • [®] • 23:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - A good, high-quality photo – and a frankly spectacular cloning job – but sadly rather underwhelming. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I find the clone job rather frightning. Nothing I'd ever like to see illustrating an encyclopedia. Sorry. Keep it real, please. --Dschwen (talk) 21:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 21:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for your reviews. I've cropped the image a little.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  09:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)