Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dojikko.png

File:Dojikko.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2010 at 20:48:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dojikko.png Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dojikko.png

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by Niabot
  In original this is an SVG file, but with 18 MB it is to large for the current SVG-renderer of commons. PS: Don't try to open the SVG with your browser, it will be stuck for a long time, until the image will show up. (Maybe a good test for hardware acceleration in beta state browsers) -- Niabot (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Niabot (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Question Beautiful colors! But there are the strange movement and the anatomic aberrations of the girl at right that annoy me. Why the girl at left is partialy out of the image frame? Where is the eighth arm of the octopus? =D --Citron (talk) 22:38, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

  Can you please describe what does not look right with the anatomy of the girl to the right? The left girl is intentionally outside the image, giving the feeling she is pressed against an invisible wall, with no escape from what is comming. Why seven? My little secret, since this is fictional and not an anatomic study of an octopus. ;-) --Niabot (talk) 06:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Hmm my english is approximate. The anatomy of the girl to the right isn't correct especially it looks like she has not bust, the breasts are placed on the pelvis. Her position is impossible : trying to do the same, you can't have your right head when you lose balance! Especially on the tip of one foot. For the left girl, the idea is not bad, but why leave a big gap in front she? The space is poorly managed... For the octopus, you're excused! :) --Citron (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not educational. Steven Walling 01:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment Niabot asked me explain further. To educate is to train or instruct someone on a subject. This image has no edifying purpose or quality. It's a cartoon. There are major composition problems as well, like Citron points out above. Steven Walling 14:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
    •  Comment} It is an illustration for a dojikko, a clumsy character type, common in anime and manga. Why shouldn't it be educating or used to illustrate this subject? --Niabot (talk) 15:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
      •  Comment Even if you disagree about educational value, the quality is just not there for FP. Steven Walling 16:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment The problem with educational value is that the concept of a clumsy character can be pretty well described by words, so this illustration does not add much value. But that is not the only reason why this can be featurable - the guidelines say "Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are none the less wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.". Trouble is, I don't have the slightest clue whether that is the case here or not... It definitely looks like it was a huge amount of work and (I think) it is well made. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
  • On second thought,  Support for the effort of creating non-photographic content. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:16, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Commons is not deviantART Przykuta → [edit] 22:53, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 00:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Dojikko Moeeeeeeee. I think that this image is educational for the Otaku culture. Takabeg (talk) 06:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support per Kabelleger. --mathias K 08:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer (talk) 14:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - without meaning any disparagement of the work here, I don't see the wow for a featured-level image. Jonathunder (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Superb work. Rastrojo _(D•ES) 17:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - ditto to Steven Walling and Jonathunder - MPF (talk) 18:29, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Not a very compelling image. Definitely not featured picture caliber. Kaldari (talk) 21:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support very good. Diego Grez ^{return fire} 21:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Question What is the tripping girl supposed to be wearing? A transparent skirt that's open in the front? Isn't that a bit absurd (and gratuitous)? Kaldari (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Not really, because it is very common that a dojikko exposes herself. ([1], [2]). In this case we have a mixture from maid costume and an apron. --Niabot (talk) 08:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
    • It seems unnecessary for illustrating the concept. Would it at least be possible for the underwear not to be skin pink? Kaldari (talk) 23:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 05:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose see at the top--Citron (talk) 09:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not educational. --Llorenzi (talk) 20:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Citron. I do enjoy the septopus however. -- Sdgjake (talk) 15:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Ggia (talk) 13:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support what is education?Bunnyfrosch (talk) 16:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 00:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)