Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Divinity School Interior 3, Bodleian Library, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg

File:Divinity School Interior 3, Bodleian Library, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2016 at 16:30:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Divinity School Interior 3, Bodleian Library, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Divinity School Interior 3, Bodleian Library, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Code -- Code (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Code (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 18:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I love the depth of field, among many other things. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Rettinghaus (talk) 15:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Always a pleasure to see nominations from David after a long drought ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm not actually nominating, it's Code nominating them! (Thanks Code). Diliff (talk) 11:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support David, David… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral I think the view from slightly further back is a little more balanced, and already FP. — Julian H.^✈ 07:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Question - That's a good point. The composition you linked is better. Should that disqualify this image from consideration, as a less-great version of a FP? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

• No, it shouldn't disqualify it. Every voter should decide, with all the information in mind, if this photo should be an FP in addition to the other one. That's my opinion at least. — Julian H.^✈ 08:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

• It's probably too late to change this nomination (and it looks like it will pass), but maybe this image could have been nominated instead, as it is the view from the other end of the room, instead of from the same end. Diliff (talk) 14:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think this one does not add anything to the previous already FP of the same place. FP should be rare. Per discussion.--Jebulon (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am with Jebulon here, great quality of course, but the picture is just a few steps further in comparison to this other FP of David. Both are too similar to me (with no essential change in the composition) in order to grant to both of them the FP award. --Poco² 23:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:51, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors