Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chitraas, Wama, Nuristan, Afghanistan - panoramio.jpg

File:Chitraas, Wama, Nuristan, Afghanistan - panoramio.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2018 at 11:43:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Chitraas, Wama, Nuristan, Afghanistan - panoramio.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chitraas, Wama, Nuristan, Afghanistan - panoramio.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Afghanistan
•  Info created by Abdul Qahar Nuristan… - nominated by Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Wow for me. -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not for me, sorry. Lighting, contrast, and technical quality could be better. --Basotxerri (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basotxerri.--Peulle (talk) 18:31, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basotxerri. Striking motif, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support This is quite a document. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It would be nice to have an FP from Afghanistan, and this had potential, but it's unsharp and the color cast at left just seals the deal. Daniel Case (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Colorwise it looks a lot better, but it's still a lot less sharp then an FP of this type should be. Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Now. It is an interesting and good composition so I took the liberty of fixing it. If you don't like it please revert it. 'Pinging' voters for the change: Ю. Данилевский, Basotxerri, Peulle, Ikan Kekek, Tomascastelazo, Daniel Case. --Cart (talk) 09:34, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - Good work! That sure is better. However, the upper left corner still looks a little strange, and not just at full size but at 240% of full screen on my laptop. I think there's still some CA. I will consider whether to strike my oppose vote, but I don't think I'm ready to support, at least not yet. Would you like to do a bit more work on that corner? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

• That corner is really in shadow, so a totally different light than the rest of the photo. I think got the CA, what you see is probably blue tint of shadow. I think it would missrepresent the landscape if I brought too much of that part into sunlight. I can try to do some work on it though. --Cart (talk) 17:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

• Ok Ikan, corner tweaked, that is as much as I can do. --Cart (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm still not convinced, sorry. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

• I'm not, either, but for me, it's enough to strike my oppose vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Lo and behold! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:39, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:27, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 21:51, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)