Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de la Resurrección de Cristo, Podgorica, Montenegro, 2014-04-14, DD 09-11 HDR.jpg

File:Catedral de la Resurrección de Cristo, Podgorica, Montenegro, 2014-04-14, DD 09-11 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2014 at 20:15:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de la Resurrección de Cristo, Podgorica, Montenegro, 2014-04-14, DD 09-11 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de la Resurrección de Cristo, Podgorica, Montenegro, 2014-04-14, DD 09-11 HDR.jpg

•  Info HDR shot of an all-around view (15mm) of the interior of the Serbian Orthodox Cathedral of the Resurrection of Christ, Podgorica, capital of Montenegro. The construction of the temple began in 1993 and took 20 years. The official inauguration took place on October 7th 2013 in a very crowded ceremony driven by 8 Serbian Orthodox partriarchs. All by me, Poco² 20:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 20:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support nice job. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support A bit confusing, but very impressive. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support per above.--ArildV (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support--XRay ^talk 16:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support A bit sad you didn't go 8mm (as it is composition is a bit messy), but the quality is fine, and it looks valuable. Thumbnail doesn't do it justice - Benh (talk) 11:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Oh got it, that's probably as far as u could go without getting black areas ? - Benh (talk) 11:36, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
    • Benh: I could have gone to a lower focal length (14 or even 13mm) without black areas but but my target was to get the roof and due to the popularity of the place, it was crowded. I could keep them away from the camera (with help of a local) but I had no chance to do it with lower mm (see here as an example the result at 13 mm). Note that the camera was on the floor. Poco² 12:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 20:15, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --07:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Merops (talk) 07:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose should be rotated 90°, because I have a right eye and a left eye. --Claus (talk) 03:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

  Claus, can you please elaborate your comment? I haven't understood the reason why I must rotate 90° that otherwise makes you oppose. Poco² 17:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

• He is saying the symmetry is unidirectional with this image and he would prefer half be presented to the left eye and half to the right. To do this you would have to rotate 90 deg. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

• Rotating it highlights that the suspended light structure isn't perfectly symmetrical in the shot. But for the walls, one really has to keep rotating the image as one scans around. So I don't think there is any "right" way up. -- Colin (talk) 11:48, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh, I agree, was just translating. Saffron Blaze (talk) 14:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure, either. Poco² 15:18, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

• What aren't you sure about? The symmetry in your picture is top to bottom, not left to right (as per the eyes). Unfortunately your image is not even that symmetrical top to bottom. Rotating the image would only make this lack of symmetry more visible. So, the advice is... leave it alone. No rotation. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:33, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

• I was trying to say that I'm not convinced either about rotating the picture. So, I'd prefer to leave it as it is. Poco² 19:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 11:48, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors