Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cass Saddle, Craigieburn Forest Park, New Zealand.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cass Saddle, Craigieburn Forest Park, New Zealand.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2020 at 06:25:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/New_Zealand#Canterbury_(Waitaha)
Info All by me. It's a view of Black Range, Canterbury, New Zealand. -- Podzemnik (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)- Support--Peulle (talk) 09:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 11:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Quality is great as usual, but I do have concerns that there are 40+ FPs of Waitaha. This may be too many. Charles (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- We also have 87 FPs of the Alps in Trentino-South Tyrol, many of them of the same alps, a place with an area of about 1/3 of Waitaha. 50 FPs of alps in Vorarlberg, area 5,8% of Waitaha.
- And then there are 103 FPs from a tiny insignificant place called Lysekil Municipality. No complaints there yet. --Cart (talk) 21:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- I think the 87 FPs is far too many. There is much duplication and they cannot all be some of the finest on Commons. Surely, they devalue the FP award. If you published a book on Trentino, you wouldn't even include them all! Cart's comment about Lysekil misses the point completely. Charles (talk) 22:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- My point (albeit in a cheeky comment) was that if you have an active photographer somewhere, that place will be over-represented, in line with what Podzemnik says below. --Cart (talk) 23:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: I wish we had more diversification at FP: geographical (there are around 31 countries without a single FP), creator (eg. Poco a Poco has created around 5 % of our FPs), topic (I think we don't have enough portraits / street photography / food photos etc. compared to eg. landscapes) and so on. The project is fully dependent on its users and it'll always be biased. We can only do our best in supporting minority groups and people from underprivileged communities to join us. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 23:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good panorama. I get Charles' point but it's a reflection of the fact that we have only a couple dozen highly active nominators and obviously they produce lots of content from the places near where they live. Of course we should be really happy to encourage new contributors and produce a more diverse selection of FPs, but Podzemnik should still keep these coming! Cmao20 (talk) 23:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- and I guess I'll keep voting for them! Charles (talk) 08:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:17, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 18:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Meiræ 16:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 06:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --pandakekok9 05:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New_Zealand#Canterbury_(Waitaha)
