Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canna sp.jpg

File:Canna sp.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2009 at 23:19:37

•  Info Everything by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 23:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Muhammad (talk) 23:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Like usually by Muhammad Mahdi Karim --kaʁstn 14:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - When I see it as a beautiful flower growing amidst the dead foliage of its species, the ugly dead foliage doesn't bother me any more. Downtowngal (talk) 16:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful indeed. —kallerna™ 17:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral great quality and colors but I'm not convinced by the composition : the space in front of the flower should be greater than the space behind it. --ianaré (talk) 18:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:51, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose in my opinion the composition is a bit cluttered. Quality is good though. --AngMoKio (talk) 08:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition. The flower is pointing the wrong direction. There are also no mitigating reasons for the minimal resolution (to quote the requirements "it is important that nominated pictures have as high a resolution as possible"). Certainly a QI, but not enough wow for FP. -- Ram-Man 01:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Mitigating reasons are required if the image is below the 2mp requirement. --Muhammad (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
    • Mitigating reasons are required whenever an image violates any of the basic requirements, not just when an image has too low of a resolution. This allows us to accept images that are special but violate the rules (too low resolution, too much noise, unsharp, etc.). We feature pictures that are most useful. Intentionally downsampled images are intentionally not as useful and thus violate the rules, as quoted above. There is no good reason for this. -- Ram-Man 11:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Estrilda (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)