Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brumadinho, Minas Gerais (33198854048).jpg

File:Brumadinho, Minas Gerais (33198854048).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2019 at 18:57:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Brumadinho, Minas Gerais (33198854048).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brumadinho, Minas Gerais (33198854048).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry
•  Info created by Vinícius Mendonça/Ibama - uploaded by Tm - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 18:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 18:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I must say, you are very active for a 'Retired' user. --Cart (talk) 19:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

I agree, Arion is talented enough to be active and retired at the same time. --Boothsift 23:09, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose I Google translated the Portuguese file description. This is what we're supposed to see: "Socioenvironmental catastrophe caused by the dam rupturing of the mining company Vale in Brumadinho (MG)". However, it just looks like a strip mine with some dirty water. And since there's nothing else making the picture special, I don't see how it's an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: This is part of the mine dam that collapsed. See Brumadinho dam disaster. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 19:46, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

• I'm well aware of what happened, but I think this is a VI candidate, not an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Abstain per the discussion at ANU and lack of apology and explanation from ArionEstar for his past behaviour. – Lucas^T 20:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Request Hello guys, I ask you to vote here because it will be my last nomination for the time being… I am going to stay a few months out of this community, I think it suits as an apology... So, bye and be happy! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - An apology is "I apologize for doing x, understand why it was wrong and promise not to do it again because I will do a, b, and c to make sure I avoid it." Claiming you will stay away for a few months is (a) not credible right now and (b) in no way at all an apology. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

• When you are silent, there is a consent. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment This response is suspiciously reactionary and should have come way sooner to have any credibility. Per Ikan this is not an apology. You are just trying to weasel yourself away from consequences, act only if other people call you out, as always. I'm sick of this and will not engage any further. – Lucas^T 20:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

• No ArionEstar, no problems. By the way, careful words, again. If I were right, I would argue against this situation. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 21:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Support nice light, quite good details for an aerial photo. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support wie Christian Ferrer --Ralf Roletschek 21:14, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 22:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan--Boothsift 23:09, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan.--Vulphere 14:11, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan. --Karelj (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan. --David290 (talk) 05:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 14:07, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 12:11, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan.--Eatcha (talk) 04:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:10, 17 June 2019 (UTC)