Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bronchial anatomy.jpg

File:Bronchial anatomy.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2010 at 11:41:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bronchial anatomy.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bronchial anatomy.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Patrick.lynch - nominated by 99of9 -- 99of9 (talk) 11:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator, keen to support professional educational illustrators who become wikipedians and release their artwork under free licenses! -- 99of9 (talk) 11:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Υπέρ --патриот8790^{Say whatever you want} 19:25, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I consider any anatomical illustration that grosses me out to be a success. ;) Steven Walling 00:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 05:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support high educational value, great! --Taraxacum (talk) 09:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 09:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 14:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support a masterpiece.. --Hydrox (talk) 17:08, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Support Could be SVG --The Photographer (talk) 23:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Could be, but why should it be? That just removes editing options for the vast majority of people who don't have svg-editing capability - MPF (talk) 13:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
    • There is a very good free svg editor called Inkscape, so editing is not exactly restricted. Nevertheless, my reason for nominating this is simply that I did not see any svg anatomy images that looked this good. If anyone makes a fantastic svg image, I'll support that too! --99of9 (talk) 00:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

But it doesn't come packaged in with computers that people buy; how many people go through the difficulty of finding it and taking the risk of installing it? Very few, I bet. I tried once, and got a warning that installing it might harm my computer, so I didn't. - MPF (talk) 08:56, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I invite you to draw in SVG, if you need help. I could convert this to SVG like other works --The Photographer (talk) 01:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

already a FP

If you do convert it and it looks better, I'll be happy to vote to replace this if it becomes a FP. At this stage however, the somewhat comparable SVG File:Respiratory_system_complete_en.svg (which is already a FP) is not as nice looking in my opinion (although it is a very fine diagram, and is somewhat more comprehensive, so I'm not voting to delist). --99of9 (talk) 01:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I just realised that you might be under the impression that I drew/painted this. I'm afraid my abilities are no where near this level. I've drawn some figures in svg Category:Diagrams by User:99of9, but they're nowhere near this league. --99of9 (talk) 03:26, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

I hope I can do it in SVG. You've convinced me I see it as easy to make but I can not wait for all the world to see so. Nice work, but bad format. --The Photographer (talk) 15:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Support - because it's not a svg ;-) MPF (talk) 13:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated