Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Broadway tower edit4.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2009 at 15:15:40

Info created by Newton 2, - uploaded by Martin H. - nominated by David0811 -- David0811 (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- David0811 (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't think we need two featured versions of the same image File:Broadway tower edit.jpg, it was even picture of the year 2007 -- Gorgo (talk) 16:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Gorgo wrote the reason. --Karelj (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Gorgo. —kallerna™ 18:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose, this version is a lot worse than the already featured image. --Aqwis (talk) 20:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Gorgo. --Georgez (talk) 21:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could we do a procedural closure here? Durova (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I prefer the picture of the year 2007 version. Calandrella (talk) 21:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
QuestionAqwis, can you explain why this version is worse? David0811 (talk) 23:56, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Without the person, the left part of the picture is just useless, empty space that detracts from the composition. --Aqwis (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Without the person, the picture loses the sense of perspective that made it so interesting in the first place.202.12.233.23 10:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Scale is what makes the original picture so powerful. JalalV (talk) 10:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose simple crop, takes 10 seconds to do this. Image does not have any purpose compared with the other versions of the image, i simply uploaded it to save commons from a trash 640px version of the image of the year. This nomination is needless, close it and delete the image as it is superseeded by other versions and not used anywhere. --Martin H. (talk) 00:17, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've already seen this tower somewhere on Commons (I mean a nomination). What is the reason to nominate it again? Are we going to estabilish a picturnality cult? ;-) --Aktron (talk) 15:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Pom² (talk) 09:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu