Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breithorn Panorama.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Breithorn Panorama.svg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2010 at 10:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info uploaded by Xavax - created and nominated by Ikiwaner (talk) 10:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Support Ever seen Matterhorn, Jungfrau, Montblanc as well as Switzerlands highest mountains Dom and Finsteraarhorn at once? -- Ikiwaner (talk) 10:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)- Support -- Pouts31 (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:29, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support - great educational value. Jonathunder (talk) 12:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support Excellent work --The Photographer (talk) 13:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Oppose -- Sorry to disagree but I don't like the long and (too) narrow stripe, much of it of sky. The image quality is not excellent either, and the labels are difficult to read. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- That sounds like a discrepancy to me: If I'd had made it wider you would see even more sky and on the ground projection distortions would become obvious. Please consider the image resolution of 56 Megapixel when judging image quality. I have a 2m wide printout at home which looks absolutely perfect. If you can't read the labels you can scale the graphic-that's the advantage of a vector format. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I understand the difficulties, which may not have an adequate solution. I'm also aware of the lighting problems with this kind of image. Maybe this was not the best spot to take the 360º panorama; a higher place would have been much better, of course but is there such place? The truth is I don't sympatize with 360º panoramas, not only due to the technical problems involved but also because they don't offer a realistic view of the subject. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- That sounds like a discrepancy to me: If I'd had made it wider you would see even more sky and on the ground projection distortions would become obvious. Please consider the image resolution of 56 Megapixel when judging image quality. I have a 2m wide printout at home which looks absolutely perfect. If you can't read the labels you can scale the graphic-that's the advantage of a vector format. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment Might be better to switch the names with numbers for non-English speakers, that way the mountains could be labelled on the image page description. --IdLoveOne (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Translate field names like Matterhorn to Horn above the alpine tundra?? You should find the field names as lemmata in enwiki, i.e. the ones linked in my support vote. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- No, obviously not. But very definitely to Cervino and Cervin - MPF (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Feel free to create a fernch or italian only version for the specific wikis. In cartography however it's a standard to take the names in the language that is spoken prominently in the place of the object being labeled. --Ikiwaner (talk) 10:51, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- No, obviously not. But very definitely to Cervino and Cervin - MPF (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Alves. I can't even read the labels, and I don't think this was ever meant to be an SVG. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:34, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Ditto to Alvesgaspar. Agree with IdLoveOne too, as numbers can be put in a much larger font than names. - MPF (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - This is not what SVG is for; also, the large-image link does not seem to work on this, and should be removed from the file page. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 23:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support Interesting!--Mbz1 (talk) 23:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - As Alvesgaspar. Lycaon (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Question how do I open the file? The option "Interactive large-image-viewer (non-Flash)" does not work. Ggia (talk) 22:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)- Support Strong Pro. I know how hard it is to create these panoramas - this one is near perfect!--ΠΣΟ˚ (talk) 00:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - As Alvesgaspar. --Karelj (talk) 16:41, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Strong support.. Excellent work.. but I have the following question.. how this file can be used online? because the firefox does not load it.. and the "Interactive large-image-viewer" cannot read it. I opened the file off-line to view it after downloading it. Ggia (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
