Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beryl-Muscovite-aquamarine nagar balanced budd.jpg

File:Beryl-Muscovite-aquamarine nagar balanced budd.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2010 at 23:56:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Beryl-Muscovite-aquamarine nagar balanced budd.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beryl-Muscovite-aquamarine nagar balanced budd.jpg

•  Info created by Rob Lavinsky - uploaded by RKBot - nominated by IdLoveOne -- IdLoveOne (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- IdLoveOne (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support nice --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:46, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting rock.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Nice--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 18:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 18:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The background looks unacceptably artificial. Steven Walling 17:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad background --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:10, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The artificial background blows it. Motif itself marvellous and well pictured. Pls fix it, and you´ll get another (sup).--ΠΣΟ˚ (talk) 00:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Really nice, as for artificial background, it just looks like it is on display in a museum –hoverFly | chat? 14:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)+
•  Support One of the thousands of Rob Lavinskys very fine mineral pictures. :-) -- Ra'ike T C 07:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose As per PI-SIGMA-OMICRON--Jebulon (talk) 16:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Artificial background. --99of9 (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Alt

•  Info White balanced. --IdLoveOne (talk) 00:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
  •  Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 01:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose This one has some blown highlights. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The background looks unacceptably artificial. Steven Walling 17:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose artificial coloring --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:10, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Question Why two chances for this picture ? Must I vote for the two pics ? Is it another nomination ? "Alternative versions" are confusing IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
  • I just liked the brightness of the aquamarine when white balanced and wondered if others would too. GIMP's white balance is definitely not infallible (you should see some of the thing's it's done, yeesh) but it's usually considered more realistic. --IdLoveOne (talk) 04:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:16, 9 October 2010 (UTC)