Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bee 01 (MK).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Bee 01 (MK).jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2014 at 06:29:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info I`ll try this one. I know the dof isn`t perfect on the upper one but I really like the composition so I think I will give It a try. c/u/n by me -- mathias K 06:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- mathias K 06:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Well-captured. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 18:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 21:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I think it is important to count with an existing category for these bees and the identification of the flower would be also good Poco2 09:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- @ Diego: Done I`ve created a category, cleaned up the taxon cat and added and linked the name of the flower. Thx for the advice! ;-) --mathias K 15:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition, useless file name. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- thanks for your great review. Very helpfull... But for real, useless filename?? Are you kidding me? It is a picture of a completly IDed bee. So whats that for an "useless argument"? --07:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Support Technically not perfect, but indeed nice composition. --DXR (talk) 11:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 20:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Overhead view, heads OOF, focus seems more on the legs of the upper bee. Jee 16:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Jee You're right with the limited dof. But whats wrong with an overhead view? Do You see everything from sideview? I think an overhead view has the same eligibility like any other direction?! --mathias K 07:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just a matter of taste. :) Jee 08:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results: