Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Almsee Nordbucht-4224.jpg

File:Almsee Nordbucht-4224.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2019 at 07:44:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Almsee Nordbucht-4224.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Almsee Nordbucht-4224.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria
•  Info created & uploaded by User:Isiwal - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Very peaceful and much more intimate than a lot of alpine pictures, because we see the shimmering reflections and swans on the lake and trees next to the lake and see the sides but not the tops of the mountains. I'm guessing some of you might not love the hazy mountainsides, but I think they're worth it for the resplendent light and the mood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment But no sky... Charles (talk) 11:22, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I looked at it for a little while and I just don't get the big wow from this light. --Peulle (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Very beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support If you can sell it as a cheesy photo wallpaper, it get's my vote...and because of the colors, and the light and ... so on. Remarkable picture though.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful shot me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle and Charles. -- Karelj (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think that a sky would have made it better, anyways per Peulle. --BoothSift 23:04, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - To those of you objecting that there's no sky in this photo: A certain sameness tends to afflict nominations here. Why on Earth does every photo of a landscape have to have a sky in it? Norms exist to be deviated from. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:49, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan's comment above. Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice scenery but still lacking something for FP, sorry, --Poco² 10:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting for me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 12:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Flat lighting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:58, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:29, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Not every landscape photo needs the whole package of sky, mountain and water. Sometimes focusing on what's there on eye level is more relaxing. – Lucas 12:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --EATCHA (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--C messier (talk) 08:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria