Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 01.jpg

File:2015 Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2016 at 16:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 19:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:01, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Could have been ordinary if it wasn't for the cloud formation opening over the top to let the light in. Nice timing! --w.carter-Talk 08:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral - That's a very nice landscape, and I would support it except that the crops on both the left and right bother me because they cut things off in a way I find distracting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek: Look now again. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks. Mild  Support now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sort of unsharp on the mojuntain, colors kind of dull, composition kind of chaotic and frankly I'm not sure spring—or at least these weather conditions in spring—was the best time to take this picture. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose One word came to my mind – uninteresting. Sorry but that’s what it was. The image just doesn’t focus on anything, leving me wondering: What’s the message? The composition does not offer any clear lines leading my eyes through the frame. Is the distant church on the ridge of any importance? Then, there’s quality. Details are soft even at that small image size, the bright cloud in center is blown. The flat light doesn’t help, making colours looking even more washed-out. I would oppose on QI as well for this. So, there’s no wow at all on my side, neither for quality nor for composition or lighting. Then, maybe I am missing the point, so: Why is this image supposed to be one of the very best we’ve got on Commons? --Kreuzschnabel 21:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I like this composition, especially the plastic clouds. Very good for me -- Spurzem (talk) 18:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 23:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose to many soft areas, some clouds are burned out. In total: nothing for a FP image. Sorry. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 22:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural