Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Park w Kłodzku.jpg

File:2014 Park w Kłodzku.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2014 at 22:55:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Park w Kłodzku.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Park w Kłodzku.jpg

•  Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. A little unsharp, but nice atmosphere. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral I'd feel better about supporting it if the CA issues in the upper right were addressed. Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

This is not a CA, only the strong sunlight shining towards the lens. CA is colorful, and the phenomenon in the upper right corner is without color.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Almost, but not quite. It's fixable. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support. Excellent composition but the little CAs should be removed. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:25, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp and no "wow". --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely composition, reminds the work of P.M. Monsted -- Lauro Sirgado^contribs 13:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry. CAs and IMO not sharp enough for an FP. Nice composition.--XRay ^talk 16:17, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

This is not a CA, only the strong sunlight shining towards the lens. CA is colorful, and the phenomenon in the upper right corner is without color.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --.snoopy. 21:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Great mood and composition. The "CA" looks like "blooming" to me, which is a CCD phenomenon though while the D7100 has a CMOS sensor. I tend to blame the lens for coma, a 18–200 mm superzoom would naturally not serve as a master in sharpness and contrast control like a 50 mm prime would have done here (see lenstip.com, worst coma just at 50 mm focal length!). – What’s worse, the image is overexposed IMHO, the automatic metering did not guess quite correctly, thus  Oppose. Is the RAW still available? If so, I suggest to re-develop with −⅔ or even −1 EV exposure correction. --Kreuzschnabel 19:38, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:23, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! Superb place! Good light and composition. ArionEstar (talk) 19:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I am not able to open the original file after downloading. I tried it several times. Wheater with LR, PS or Irfan view, it won´t work! Any other pictures do! It works now after three times.. :-( --Hubertl (talk) 09:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
• weak  Support It´s not really Wow, but a very good impression! --Hubertl (talk) 12:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Nice mood, but no 'WOW' effect. Quality and sharpness is enough IMO. --Jar.ciurusUser talk:Jar.ciurus 17:03, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
• Half  Oppose Has anyone looked at previous featured pictures of this theme? It seems like this one is nice, but not exceptional given the content (similar to how I'd evaluated a sunset). -- Ram-Man 02:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Boston9 (talk) 15:14, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Jacmu (talk) 20:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very impressive, the mist adds some mystery. In this case the outlines should be soft, I do not see it being unsharp. Abrimaal (talk) 22:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support AlexKazakhov (talk) 22:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Shack3000 (talk) 20:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /— revi_msg 14:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural