Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:02 days old .jpg

File:02 days old .jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2010 at 16:03:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:02 days old .jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:02 days old .jpg

•  Info created by Romate - uploaded by Romate - nominated by Romate -- Romate (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Info This is one (I think the best) rarely picture of a set. The five blackbird chicks are two days old.
•  Neutral as nominator -- Romate (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Quality not the best, but OK. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'd really like to support, but I find the blur in the lower left to be too distracting. Same with the dark spot in the lower right (though I consider that minor in comparison to the blur). Sorry. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 01:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - The nestlings can be seen very clearly, I don'f find the blur in the lower too distracting.--Cactus26 (talk)
•  Support - Rare and very good quality image. --Quartl (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:55, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 16:14, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Classic wildlife shot well executed. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 17:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Question - what is the situation of the nest, and legal position in Germany of taking photos of birds at the nest? - MPF (talk) 00:26, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Info The nest was in my own garage and in Germany it is not legal to disturb them with photography, film, or similar acts. I have not disturb them of course ! I have not used my car about 5 weeks and I have only taken pictures when the parents are away or I have used an EOS with a zoom from far away ! --Romate (talk) 06:42, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Info Im Originaltext: BNatSchG 2002 § 42 (1) Es ist verboten... 3. wild lebende Tiere der streng geschützten Arten und der europäischen Vogelarten an ihren Nist-, Brut-, Wohn- oder Zufluchtstätten durch Aufsuchen, Fotografieren, Filmen oder ähnliche Handlungen zu stören...

Ich habe die Tiere (die freiwillig zu mir gekommen sind) selbstverständlich nicht gestört und es erfreuen sich nach wie vor alle 5 Amseln bester Gesundheit (soweit ich sie noch gesehen habe).--Romate (talk) 09:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Support - Danke schön! MPF (talk) 16:56, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 12:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support 99of9 (talk) 22:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support The series of day-to-day photos of these birds is of high encyclopedic value, and since the creator assured the birds werent disturbed, I absolutely find the image worthy of featured picture status. Calandrella (talk) 20:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds