Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2019/01

Furcifer oustaleti

View Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2015-12-11 11:22 (UTC) Scope: Acraea horta (Garden acraea) male, dorsal  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 12 December 2015 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC) Scores: 1. Garden acraea butterfly (Acraea horta) male.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Garden acraea (Acraea horta).jpg: 0 => File:Garden acraea butterfly (Acraea horta) male.jpg: Undecided so continues as current VI. <-- File:Garden acraea (Acraea horta).jpg: Undecided. ---- DeFacto (talk). 17:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-12-14 18:32 (UTC) Scope: Acraea horta (Garden acraea) male dorsal Scores: 1. Garden acraea butterfly (Acraea horta) male.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 2. Garden acraea (Acraea horta).jpg: 0 <-- => File:Garden acraea butterfly (Acraea horta) male.jpg: Undecided so continues as current VI. File:Garden acraea (Acraea horta).jpg: Undecided. <-- ---- DeFacto (talk). 17:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Portrait photographs of Runa Laila

Commons:Valued image candidates/Runa Laila on 4 July 2017 (01) (cropped).jpg	View promotion Nominated by: ~Moheen (keep talking) on 2019-01-03 06:29 (UTC) Scope: Portrait photographs of Runa Laila Used in: See global usage  Support - Nicer facial expression. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Runa Laila in 2017.jpg: -1 2. Runa Laila on 4 July 2017 (02) (cropped).jpg: +1 <-- => File:Runa Laila in 2017.jpg: Declined. File:Runa Laila002 (cropped).jpg: Promoted. <-- ---- DeFacto (talk). 17:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Acraea horta (Garden acraea) male dorsal

View opposition Nominated by: Bgag (talk) on 2008-06-16 16:07 (UTC) Scope: Furcifer oustaleti (Oustalet's chameleon) female Used in: en:Malagasy Giant Chameleon,fr:Furcifer, nl:Oustalet's kameleon  Support(Added support vote as that seems clearly to be the intention. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC))Meets all six criteria. --norro 14:18, 28 June 2008 (UTC) Result: 1 support => Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)  Question How do we seek to remove this and have new nominations for male (we already have female VI)? Charles (talk) 11:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)  Comment We must go through Pending Most Value review candidates and offer a male or female scope to erase this promotion and promote a good image with a correct scope. Badly designed scopes give this type of problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)  Question - Is this one male or female? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment female. Charles (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2019 (UTC) Thanks. This photo should probably be nominated in the scope "Furcifer oustaleti, female". Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Caméléon Madagascar 02.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Oustalet's chameleon (Furcifer oustaleti) male Montagne d’Ambre.jpg: +2 => File:Caméléon Madagascar 02.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Oustalet's chameleon (Furcifer oustaleti) male Montagne d’Ambre.jpg: Promoted. ---- DeFacto (talk). 22:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)  Support as best in current scope. Thanks for nominating the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment, this nomination isn't properly presented - this specific image was superseded as the VI in this scope, in an MVR, by File:Oustalet's chameleon (Furcifer oustaleti) male Montagne d’Ambre.jpg on 18 January 2019 (it has a "This image is a former valued image" banner on it). For the current VI to be replaced, another MVR would be required. -- DeFacto (talk). 09:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment I've tried to do it but I can't. I've had to modify this MVR. --Bgag (talk) 14:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC) @Bgag: read, and follow, the instructions here: Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review. If they aren't clear enough, please ask again. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC) It's not a competition between two nominations. It's a new one. This is for the female chameleon. The other was the male chameleon. --Bgag (talk) 16:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment As noted above Bgag Ikan Kekek , we already have VI for female, so must use MVR. And what makes you think this is a female? This is a male. Charles (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment Sorry I didn't know there was already à VI for male and female. I withdraw this nomination.--Bgag (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-12-28 16:31 (UTC) Scope: Furcifer oustaleti (Oustalet's chameleon) male  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Caméléon Madagascar 02.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 2. Oustalet's chameleon (Furcifer oustaleti) male Montagne d’Ambre.jpg: +2 <-- => File:Caméléon Madagascar 02.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Oustalet's chameleon (Furcifer oustaleti) male Montagne d’Ambre.jpg: Promoted. <-- ---- DeFacto (talk). 22:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)