Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2011/05

Closed most valued reviews/2011/05

Plaza de Toros, Malaga (general view)[edit]

View promotion
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-01 21:40 (UTC)
Scope: Plaza de Toros, Malaga (general view)
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Malaga bullring.jpg: +2 2. Málaga La Malagueta 01.jpg: +0 3. Plaza toros La Malagueta 2006.jpg: +0 => File:Malaga bullring.jpg: Promoted. File:Málaga La Malagueta 01.jpg: Declined. File:Plaza toros La Malagueta 2006.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-01 21:43 (UTC)
Scope: Plaza de Toros, Malaga (general view)
Scores: 1. Malaga bullring.jpg: +2 2. Málaga La Malagueta 01.jpg: +0 3. Plaza toros La Malagueta 2006.jpg: +0 => File:Malaga bullring.jpg: Promoted. File:Málaga La Malagueta 01.jpg: Declined. File:Plaza toros La Malagueta 2006.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-01 21:44 (UTC)
Scope: Plaza de Toros, Malaga (general view)
Scores: 1. Malaga bullring.jpg: +2 2. Málaga La Malagueta 01.jpg: +0 3. Plaza toros La Malagueta 2006.jpg: +0 => File:Malaga bullring.jpg: Promoted. File:Málaga La Malagueta 01.jpg: Declined. File:Plaza toros La Malagueta 2006.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Jasenovac Memorial Area[edit]

View promotion
Nominated by: Mile (talk) on 2011-04-17 11:28 (UTC)
Scope: Jasenovac Memorial Area
Reason: Jasenovac monument on site of Jasenovac concentration camp - largest extermination camp in the Independent State of Croatia. Site of before unseen butchering of Serbians, Jews and Romas. Colors and atmosphere are rellevant to its reputation and atmosphere there. Even nowdays those areas are so empty. -- Mile (talk)
Comment - What about this image? ;) --MrPanyGoff 07:08, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] I prefer darker colors at such spots (ambient depicted somehow), as for other concentracion camps...that one is too lively, and too close shot (also tigth crop). --Mile (talk) 07:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Comment - I would also suggest for the scope name Jasenovac Monument as in Wikipedia.--MrPanyGoff 15:04, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Its same, wouldnt change much, since there is just a museum near, which has "ongoing work" some 20 years and Croats never opened it since end of Yugoslavia. --Mile (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Support better --Tomer T (talk) 10:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Support IMHO that place was choise for this view (water and monument with black hole) Przykuta → [edit] 22:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Logor Jasenovac.JPG: +2 2. KZ-Jasenovac-Denkmal-Seitenansicht.JPG: +1 => File:Logor Jasenovac.JPG: Promoted. File:KZ-Jasenovac-Denkmal-Seitenansicht.JPG: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 09:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-04-19 08:43 (UTC)
Scope: Jasenovac Memorial Area
Reason: Good detailed and informative photo of the monument structure and composition as a whole. -- MrPanyGoff
~~Oppose~~ Atmosphere isnt appropriate for such commemoration centre. No coordinates, description in one language, IQ lower than in my candidate. Also that lake around (part of Sava river before) has some more role, corpses were often thrown in water, floating to Belgrade. Check site i gave. --Mile (talk) 11:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC) p.S. You dont do such close shots for big objects.[reply] Done Geotag is added, description is upgraded.--MrPanyGoff 12:47, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Support This view better shows the architecture of the monument --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Comment - Needs more voters. Come on people, look at both competitors and give some vote.--MrPanyGoff 18:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Logor Jasenovac.JPG: +2 2. KZ-Jasenovac-Denkmal-Seitenansicht.JPG: +1 => File:Logor Jasenovac.JPG: Promoted. File:KZ-Jasenovac-Denkmal-Seitenansicht.JPG: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 09:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Matt Reis[edit]

View opposition
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-05 05:55 (UTC)
Scope: Matt Reis
Reason: Best in scope -- Tomer T (talk)
Comment - Very nice photo but the eternal dispute about the sportsmen images comes again. There are two more good photographs so I suggest opening a MVR;) --MrPanyGoff 15:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] I followed your advice. Tomer T (talk) 17:29, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Matt Reis goal kick.jpg: +0 2. Matt Reis pregame Revs vs FC Dallas.jpg: +0 3. Matt Reis.jpg: +2 => File:Matt Reis goal kick.jpg: Declined. File:Matt Reis pregame Revs vs FC Dallas.jpg: Declined. File:Matt Reis.jpg: Promoted. --MrPanyGoff 20:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-05 17:18 (UTC)
Scope: Matt Reis
Scores: 1. Matt Reis goal kick.jpg: +0 2. Matt Reis pregame Revs vs FC Dallas.jpg: +0 3. Matt Reis.jpg: +2 => File:Matt Reis goal kick.jpg: Declined. File:Matt Reis pregame Revs vs FC Dallas.jpg: Declined. File:Matt Reis.jpg: Promoted. --MrPanyGoff 20:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-05 17:25 (UTC)
Scope: Matt Reis
Support - I support this as most representative, imo.--MrPanyGoff 17:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Matt Reis goal kick.jpg: +0 2. Matt Reis pregame Revs vs FC Dallas.jpg: +0 3. Matt Reis.jpg: +2 => File:Matt Reis goal kick.jpg: Declined. File:Matt Reis pregame Revs vs FC Dallas.jpg: Declined. File:Matt Reis.jpg: Promoted. --MrPanyGoff 20:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Shimon Peres[edit]

View promotion
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-06 21:29 (UTC)
Scope: Shimon Peres
Support More symbolic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Support - Actually I also think this is the best but at first I try to avoid some wrong interpretation of this symbolic composition.--MrPanyGoff 16:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: +2 2. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: +0 3. Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: +0 4. Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: +0 5. Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: +0 => File:Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: Promoted. File:World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: Declined. File:Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 21:12, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-06 21:30 (UTC)
Scope: Shimon Peres
Scores: 1. Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: +2 2. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: +0 3. Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: +0 4. Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: +0 5. Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: +0 => File:Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: Promoted. File:World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: Declined. File:Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 21:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-06 21:30 (UTC)
Scope: Shimon Peres
Support - I find this one as best in scope.--MrPanyGoff 18:23, 8 May 2011 (UTC) Vote changed.--MrPanyGoff 16:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: +2 2. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: +0 3. Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: +0 4. Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: +0 5. Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: +0 => File:Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: Promoted. File:World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: Declined. File:Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 21:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-06 21:31 (UTC)
Scope: Shimon Peres
Scores: 1. Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: +2 2. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: +0 3. Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: +0 4. Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: +0 5. Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: +0 => File:Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: Promoted. File:World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: Declined. File:Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 21:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-06 21:31 (UTC)
Scope: Shimon Peres
Scores: 1. Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: +2 2. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: +0 3. Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: +0 4. Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: +0 5. Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: +0 => File:Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: Promoted. File:World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: Declined. File:Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: Declined. File:Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 21:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Albany City Hall, New York (exterior)[edit]

View promotion
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-09 14:38 (UTC)
Scope: Albany City Hall, New York (exterior)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. AlbanyNYCityHall.jpg: +1 2. Albany City Hall twilight.jpg: +0 => File:AlbanyNYCityHall.jpg: Promoted. File:Albany City Hall twilight.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 21:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-09 14:40 (UTC)
Scope: Albany City Hall, New York (exterior)
Scores: 1. AlbanyNYCityHall.jpg: +1 2. Albany City Hall twilight.jpg: +0 => File:AlbanyNYCityHall.jpg: Promoted. File:Albany City Hall twilight.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 21:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Antennae Galaxies[edit]

Commons:Valued image candidates/Antennae galaxies (captured by Chandra, Hubble and Spitzer).jpg

View promotion
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-09 21:38 (UTC)
Scope: Antennae Galaxies
Support This image is the same as the next, if I'm not mistaken.[1] The only difference is that the next image is compressed more. The first image is lower resolution and includes xray emission (blue) so that the extensive distribution of extremely hot gas is visible. Also, the field of view is somewhat larger and less dynamic ranges is shown (little detail is visible in the bright emission nebulae). I think this one is the best illustration of the mainscope. The first image is a valuable illustration of the xray emission of this object. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Galactic spectacle.jpg: 0 2. Antennae galaxies xl.jpg: +1 3. Antennae, Hubble images.jpg: 0 => File:Galactic spectacle.jpg: Declined. File:Antennae galaxies xl.jpg: Promoted. File:Antennae, Hubble images.jpg: Declined. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-09 21:38 (UTC)
Scope: Antennae Galaxies
Support This image is the same as the next, if I'm not mistaken.[2] The only difference is that the next image is compressed more. The first image is lower resolution and includes xray emission (blue) so that the extensive distribution of extremely hot gas is visible. Also, the field of view is somewhat larger and less dynamic ranges is shown (little detail is visible in the bright emission nebulae). I think this one is the best illustration of the mainscope. The first image is a valuable illustration of the xray emission of this object. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Galactic spectacle.jpg: 0 2. Antennae galaxies xl.jpg: +1 3. Antennae, Hubble images.jpg: 0 => File:Galactic spectacle.jpg: Declined. File:Antennae galaxies xl.jpg: Promoted. File:Antennae, Hubble images.jpg: Declined. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Panoramics of the old city of Dubrovnik[edit]

View opposition
Nominated by: Michaelphillipr (talk) on 2011-05-07 10:32 (UTC)
Scope: Panoramics of the old city of Dubrovnik
Comment I change the scope that is more correct, with this syntax. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] That's right, this scope name is better. The important thing is that this is the Old City not the whole Dubrovnik. As for the nominated image, it is very informative but tilted which is quite distracting. --MrPanyGoff 11:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Dubrovnik 042.jpg: +0 2. DubrownikPanorama.JPG: +0 3. Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: +1 4. Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: +0 5. Dubrovnik .jpg: +0 => File:Dubrovnik 042.jpg: Declined. File:DubrownikPanorama.JPG: Declined. File:Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: Promoted. File:Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: Declined. File:Dubrovnik .jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-10 21:18 (UTC)
Scope: Panoramics of the old city of Dubrovnik
Scores: 1. Dubrovnik 042.jpg: +0 2. DubrownikPanorama.JPG: +0 3. Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: +1 4. Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: +0 5. Dubrovnik .jpg: +0 => File:Dubrovnik 042.jpg: Declined. File:DubrownikPanorama.JPG: Declined. File:Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: Promoted. File:Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: Declined. File:Dubrovnik .jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-10 21:19 (UTC)
Scope: Panoramics of the old city of Dubrovnik
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Dubrovnik 042.jpg: +0 2. DubrownikPanorama.JPG: +0 3. Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: +1 4. Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: +0 5. Dubrovnik .jpg: +0 => File:Dubrovnik 042.jpg: Declined. File:DubrownikPanorama.JPG: Declined. File:Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: Promoted. File:Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: Declined. File:Dubrovnik .jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-10 21:20 (UTC)
Scope: Panoramics of the old city of Dubrovnik
Scores: 1. Dubrovnik 042.jpg: +0 2. DubrownikPanorama.JPG: +0 3. Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: +1 4. Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: +0 5. Dubrovnik .jpg: +0 => File:Dubrovnik 042.jpg: Declined. File:DubrownikPanorama.JPG: Declined. File:Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: Promoted. File:Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: Declined. File:Dubrovnik .jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-10 21:21 (UTC)
Scope: Panoramics of the old city of Dubrovnik
Scores: 1. Dubrovnik 042.jpg: +0 2. DubrownikPanorama.JPG: +0 3. Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: +1 4. Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: +0 5. Dubrovnik .jpg: +0 => File:Dubrovnik 042.jpg: Declined. File:DubrownikPanorama.JPG: Declined. File:Dubrovnik centre fortificat.JPG: Promoted. File:Dubrovnik1 (js).jpg: Declined. File:Dubrovnik .jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Janis Ian[edit]

View opposition
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-05 12:37 (UTC)
Scope: Janis Ian
Reason: Best in scope. -- Tomer T (talk)
Comment - Well, I think we should also have a MVR here. This photo seems to me more representative.--MrPanyGoff 07:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Sorry, I only noticed your comment now, from some reason it wasn't on my watchlist. I have opened an MVR. Tomer T (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] When in a MVR, all images have to be in a discussed status instead of nominated ;) --MrPanyGoff 21:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Okay, now I know :) Tomer T (talk) 21:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Janis Ian 1.jpg: +0 2. Janis Ian 2.jpg: +1 => File:Janis Ian 1.jpg: Declined. File:Janis Ian 2.jpg: Promoted. --MrPanyGoff 20:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Tomer T (talk) on 2011-05-14 08:36 (UTC)
Scope: Janis Ian
Support - It is too reddish but I think it is better.--MrPanyGoff 20:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Janis Ian 1.jpg: +0 2. Janis Ian 2.jpg: +1 => File:Janis Ian 1.jpg: Declined. File:Janis Ian 2.jpg: Promoted. --MrPanyGoff 20:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral (exterior)[edit]

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-15 12:59 (UTC)
Scope: Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral (exterior)
Scores: 1. Veliko-Tarnovo-Cathedral 2.jpg: +0 2. Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral 4.jpg: +1 => File:Veliko-Tarnovo-Cathedral 2.jpg: Declined. File:Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral 4.jpg: Promoted. --MrPanyGoff 07:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-15 13:02 (UTC)
Scope: Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral (exterior)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Veliko-Tarnovo-Cathedral 2.jpg: +0 2. Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral 4.jpg: +1 => File:Veliko-Tarnovo-Cathedral 2.jpg: Declined. File:Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral 4.jpg: Promoted. --MrPanyGoff 07:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Texas State Capitol (exterior)[edit]

View promotion
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-17 09:15 (UTC)
Scope: Texas State Capitol (exterior)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. TexasStateCapitol-2010-01.JPG: +1 2. TexasStateCapitol-Nov2007.JPG: +0 => File:TexasStateCapitol-2010-01.JPG: Promoted. File:TexasStateCapitol-Nov2007.JPG: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 19:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-17 09:16 (UTC)
Scope: Texas State Capitol (exterior)
Scores: 1. TexasStateCapitol-2010-01.JPG: +1 2. TexasStateCapitol-Nov2007.JPG: +0 => File:TexasStateCapitol-2010-01.JPG: Promoted. File:TexasStateCapitol-Nov2007.JPG: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 19:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Tennessee State Capitol (exterior)[edit]

View promotion
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-24 19:49 (UTC)
Scope: Tennessee State Capitol (exterior)
Support Especially informative on the environment of the monument. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Tennessee state capitol 2009.jpg: +1 2. Tennessee State Capitol 2009.jpg: +0 => File:Tennessee state capitol 2009.jpg: Promoted. File:Tennessee State Capitol 2009.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff on 2011-05-24 19:51 (UTC)
Scope: Tennessee State Capitol (exterior)
Scores: 1. Tennessee state capitol 2009.jpg: +1 2. Tennessee State Capitol 2009.jpg: +0 => File:Tennessee state capitol 2009.jpg: Promoted. File:Tennessee State Capitol 2009.jpg: Declined. --MrPanyGoff 22:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2011/05

Contents