Category talk:Historical images by city

Why is Rif a parent category of this one?

This hierarchy makes sense until we get to Historical images by city.

digraph historical {
	a [label="Mountains"];
	b [label="Mountains by continent"];
	c [label="Mountain ranges by continent"];
	d [label="Mountain ranges of Africa"];
	e [label="Mountain ranges of Morocco"];
	f [label="Rif"];
	g [label="Historical images by city"];
	a -> b -> c -> d -> e -> f -> g;
}

Strange hierarchy.

I propose that Historical images by city no longer be a child category of Rif. Is this something I can just go in or do or should I wait for someone with more knowledge about this decision to comment on it? I am aware of similar categorizations issues like this. In general am I able to fix them right away without discussing it or should I create similar talk page sections? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonic12228 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)