Category talk:Aki-Kameyama Station
Category:Aki-Kameyama Station[edit]
An editor has requested that the category be moved to Aki-Kameyama Station (2017) citing the need to "disambiguate with Aki-Kameyama Station (1936-2003)", but as this is the only station in use with this name, it seems logical to keep the category as it is without any additional disambiguation. --DAJF (talk) 12:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- As the old station has 60+ years of history whilst the new one has less than a year, I think it is quite reasonable to disambiguate. Yasu (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I think it makes sense, but using 2017 as disambiguation is not very clear whether this station was opened in 2017 or opened then closed in 2017, maybe Aki-Kameyama Station (2017-) is better.--そらみみ (talk) 06:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
DAJF案か、そらみみ案か。どっちでもいい。サイコロ振って早く決めよう。--トトト (talk) 18:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- OK, I think it makes sense, but using 2017 as disambiguation is not very clear whether this station was opened in 2017 or opened then closed in 2017, maybe Aki-Kameyama Station (2017-) is better.--そらみみ (talk) 06:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- DAJFの現状維持案でよいと思います。この議論が4年間も放置されていること自体、今の分類名で困る人がいないことを示しています。2017年にできた駅ですがはや4年。20～30年なんてあっという間です。Aki-Kameyama Station (2017-)に改名するデメリットは、
(2017-)という文字列の付加を画像の投稿者に強いることです。人々の意識の中では「Aki-Kameyama駅」と言えばもはや一つしかないのに、いちいち作られた年を入力しなければいけない。非常に面倒です。一方のAki-Kameyama Station (1936-2003)は、途中駅だったこともあってか2021年5月現在で写真はたったの一点しかなく、この先も増える見込みはありません。過去のものと無理に対等にしようとすると、不便さというコストを利用者に強いることになります。--トトト (talk) 21:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- I would like to close this discussion unless further arguments are presented within weeks. --トトト (talk) 21:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- @トトト: Sorry for being late. I think it’s OK to close this discussion.--そらみみ (talk) 22:58, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- 閉じるつもりでいたんですが、議論の片方の意見を表明した人は閉じてはいけないというルールがあるそうで。まだ発言していない人しか閉じられないようです。あと10年ぐらいこのまま放置ですね。--トトト (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
No consensus to rename (non-admin closure) This one certainly has been open for quite a while. There are a couple of suggestions for alternative names with either (2017) or (2017-) but neither option seems to have gained support here. I also note that a hatnote was placed at the top of the two category pages in 2018 to aid editors and readers to navigate between the two entities. I can't see any consensus to rename here, so I am closing this with a default of keeping the current name. For reference of the participants, I have a fair (but not fluent) understanding of Japanese; feel free to drop me a line if you have any other cases like this that have been stuck open for a while due to a shortage of Japanese-speaking closers. From Hill To Shore (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Addendum: In closing this case down, it appears it was never listed at Commons:Categories for discussion, which could explain why the discussion became stalled. Editors who support a name change may wish to start a new discussion and ensure it is listed properly. There is no guarantee though that restarting the discussion will lead to a different outcome. From Hill To Shore (talk) 17:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)