User talk:Recitation-bot

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Recitation-bot!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:DNA-Analysis-Indicates-That-Asian-Elephants-Are-Native-to-Borneo-and-Are-Therefore-a-High-Priority-pbio.0000006.g001.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:DNA-Analysis-Indicates-That-Asian-Elephants-Are-Native-to-Borneo-and-Are-Therefore-a-High-Priority-pbio.0000006.g001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:DNA-Analysis-Indicates-That-Asian-Elephants-Are-Native-to-Borneo-and-Are-Therefore-a-High-Priority-pbio.0000006.g002.jpg
• File:DNA-Analysis-Indicates-That-Asian-Elephants-Are-Native-to-Borneo-and-Are-Therefore-a-High-Priority-pbio.0000006.g003.jpg
• File:DNA-Analysis-Indicates-That-Asian-Elephants-Are-Native-to-Borneo-and-Are-Therefore-a-High-Priority-pbio.0000006.g004.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Plant-Virus-Ecology-ppat.1003304.g001.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Plant-Virus-Ecology-ppat.1003304.g001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g008.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g008.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g003.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g007.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g006.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g012.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g010.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g001.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g009.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g005.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g002.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g011.jpg
• File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g004.jpg
• File:The-crystal-structure-of-Zika-virus-helicase-basis-for-antiviral-drug-design-13238 2016 275 Fig2 HTML.jpg
• File:The-crystal-structure-of-Zika-virus-helicase-basis-for-antiviral-drug-design-13238 2016 275 Fig1 HTML.jpg
• File:The-expanding-spectrum-of-modes-of-transmission-of-Zika-virus-a-global-concern-12941 2016 128 Fig1 HTML.jpg
• File:Neglected-Tropical-Diseases-in-the-Anthropocene-The-Cases-of-Zika-Ebola-and-Other-Infections-pntd.0004648.g001.jpg
• File:Neglected-Tropical-Diseases-in-the-Anthropocene-The-Cases-of-Zika-Ebola-and-Other-Infections-pntd.0004648.g002.jpg
• File:Correction-Spread-of-the-Invasive-Mosquitoes-Aedes-aegypti-and-Aedes-albopictus-in-the-Black-Sea-pntd.0004764.g001.jpg
• File:Oral-Susceptibility-of-Singapore-Aedes-(Stegomyia)-aegypti-(Linnaeus)-to-Zika-Virus-pntd.0001792.g003.jpg
• File:Oral-Susceptibility-of-Singapore-Aedes-(Stegomyia)-aegypti-(Linnaeus)-to-Zika-Virus-pntd.0001792.g001.jpg
• File:Oral-Susceptibility-of-Singapore-Aedes-(Stegomyia)-aegypti-(Linnaeus)-to-Zika-Virus-pntd.0001792.g002.jpg
• File:Zika-Virus-Emergence-in-Mosquitoes-in-Southeastern-Senegal-2011-pone.0109442.g002.jpg
• File:Zika-Virus-Emergence-in-Mosquitoes-in-Southeastern-Senegal-2011-pone.0109442.g001.jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Neglected-Tropical-Diseases-in-the-Anthropocene-The-Cases-of-Zika-Ebola-and-Other-Infections-pntd.0004648.g001.jpg

And also:

• File:Neglected-Tropical-Diseases-in-the-Anthropocene-The-Cases-of-Zika-Ebola-and-Other-Infections-pntd.0004648.g002.jpg

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Getting bot up to speed

@Daniel Mietchen: Hi Daniel. Bot is locked and due to insufficient data in uploads, files are being deleted. We need to get a circuit breaker to resolve this matter. Some of the concerns raised are valid and a face needs to appear to resolve the matters. That said, I would have hoped that people could have worked with you rather than just walk around slamming doors.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: Thanks, we think the problem is fixed but did not have a chance yet to test the fix in a new environment. To follow progress, see this bug list. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I have recovered some of the deleted images/figures and added the licence and information templates. [Tonight my time I will see what I can easily resurrect. (if I remember)] I note that some of the images had metadata that could have been extractable into the information template. I feel that Commons could look to test/check the metadata for such files prior to nominating for deletion, and have put a discussion topic to admins about this. At the same time, your upload bot could also avoid some of the issues with enough data. Life is a conundrum. :-)  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

There are some here that wish to have a level of 100% purity, and would rather delete than do a little legwork to fix other's errors or omissions. I find their approach disappointing, and not in the wikimedia spirit, but that is my problem.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: Thanks. The problem with the bot that day was that — as a result of an oversight during a substantial rewrite — it had split up the uploads into one part in the file namespace that was missing the metadata and another part with the metadata, which ended up in gallery space, as per bugs #62 and #63 and the potential fix. Is there anything like a test wiki for Commons? We are eying http://test.wikipedia.org/ now, and once we have a few test uploads there, I will file the bot permission. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: @Billinghurst: @Daniel Mietchen: We've had a fix ready for the issue that resulted in the block of Recitation-bot and would like to test it on test.wikipedia.org but it seems the block is global. Can you change the block to a local block so that we can test our fix and then request to be unblocked on commons? Thanks! - User:Dfko

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Report-on-the-occurrence-of-synanthropic-derived-form-of-Chrysomyamegacephala-(Diptera-biodiversity data journal-2-e1111-g001.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Report-on-the-occurrence-of-synanthropic-derived-form-of-Chrysomyamegacephala-(Diptera-biodiversity data journal-2-e1111-g001.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

BevinKacon (talk) 18:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Zika-Virus-Medical-Countermeasure-Development-Challenges-pntd.0004530.g001.jpg

File:Zika-Virus-Medical-Countermeasure-Development-Challenges-pntd.0004530.g001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyrighted Google imagery Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

BevinKacon (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Zika-Virus-Outbreak-in-Rio-de-Janeiro-Brazil-Clinical-Characterization-Epidemiological-and-pntd.0004636.g003.jpg

File:Zika-Virus-Outbreak-in-Rio-de-Janeiro-Brazil-Clinical-Characterization-Epidemiological-and-pntd.0004636.g003.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyrighted Google imagery Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

BevinKacon (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e011.jpg

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e041.jpg

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e041.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e070.jpg

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e070.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e083.jpg

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e083.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e178.jpg

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e178.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:49, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e275.jpg

File:Inside-Money-Procyclical-Leverage-and-Banking-Catastrophes-pone.0104219.e275.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:49, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Why-Publishing-Everything-Is-More-Effective-than-Selective-Publishing-of-Statistically-Significant-pone.0084896.e011.jpg

File:Why-Publishing-Everything-Is-More-Effective-than-Selective-Publishing-of-Statistically-Significant-pone.0084896.e011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

File:The-Network-of-Global-Corporate-Control-pone.0025995.e018.jpg

File:The-Network-of-Global-Corporate-Control-pone.0025995.e018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Why-Publishing-Everything-Is-More-Effective-than-Selective-Publishing-of-Statistically-Significant-pone.0084896.e002.jpg

File:Why-Publishing-Everything-Is-More-Effective-than-Selective-Publishing-of-Statistically-Significant-pone.0084896.e002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

File:A-New-Species-of-Euphlyctis-(Anura-Dicroglossidae)-from-Barisal-Bangladesh-pone.0116666.t001.jpg

File:A-New-Species-of-Euphlyctis-(Anura-Dicroglossidae)-from-Barisal-Bangladesh-pone.0116666.t001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 05:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Ecological-Changes-in-Coyotes-(Canis-latrans)-in-Response-to-the-Ice-Age-Megafaunal-Extinctions-pone.0116041.t001.jpg

File:Ecological-Changes-in-Coyotes-(Canis-latrans)-in-Response-to-the-Ice-Age-Megafaunal-Extinctions-pone.0116041.t001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 06:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Ecological-Changes-in-Coyotes-(Canis-latrans)-in-Response-to-the-Ice-Age-Megafaunal-Extinctions-pone.0116041.t004.jpg

File:Ecological-Changes-in-Coyotes-(Canis-latrans)-in-Response-to-the-Ice-Age-Megafaunal-Extinctions-pone.0116041.t004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 06:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e001.jpg

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 08:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e007.jpg

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e006.jpg

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e025.jpg

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e025.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 13:32, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e068.jpg

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e068.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e048.jpg

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e048.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 15:35, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e063.jpg

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e063.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 06:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e062.jpg

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e062.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e066.jpg

File:Neurobiological-Models-of-Two-Choice-Decision-Making-Can-Be-Reduced-to-a-One-Dimensional-Nonlinear-pcbi.1000046.e066.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 06:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:A-Primer-on-Metagenomics-pcbi.1000667.e001.jpg

File:A-Primer-on-Metagenomics-pcbi.1000667.e001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 13:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:A-Primer-on-Metagenomics-pcbi.1000667.e002.jpg

File:A-Primer-on-Metagenomics-pcbi.1000667.e002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 13:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:A-Primer-on-Metagenomics-pcbi.1000667.e006.jpg

File:A-Primer-on-Metagenomics-pcbi.1000667.e006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 13:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Environmental-and-State-Level-Regulatory-Factors-Affect-the-Incidence-of-Autism-and-Intellectual-pcbi.1003518.e002.jpg

File:Environmental-and-State-Level-Regulatory-Factors-Affect-the-Incidence-of-Autism-and-Intellectual-pcbi.1003518.e002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xover (talk) 19:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Adventures-in-Semantic-Publishing-Exemplar-Semantic-Enhancements-of-a-Research-Article-pcbi.1000361.g001.jpg

File:Adventures-in-Semantic-Publishing-Exemplar-Semantic-Enhancements-of-a-Research-Article-pcbi.1000361.g001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Enyavar (talk) 16:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)