Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 03 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Portrait_of_Simón_Bolívar_by_Arturo_Michelena.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination This image might --Wilfredor 22:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment You should complete the (english) description. --Ermell 21:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Doesn't meet criteria (not created by a Commons user). --Yerpo 08:13, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment The picture was taken by me --Wilfredor 22:50, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality and a valuable picture as well. As there's no Valued Image in this scope, please also nominate to VIC if you believe this is the best photo in scope. Yerpo, your objection that Wilfredor didn't paint the painting is invalid. Please cross out your opposing vote. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan --Milseburg 15:08, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Parque_Nacional_Lago_St_Clair-Tasmania-Australia01.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Lake St Clair National Park, Tasmania, Australia --Poco a poco 07:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  weak oppose Again I'm not sure; the detail level seems a bit low on the forest especially. I'd like to get some more input on this if I may.--Peulle 18:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Peulle. Looks tilted + trees are without details. --Podzemnik 18:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment A very good rework regarding colours, contrast, and CA. But again oversharpening. Try less. --Smial 10:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
    I gave it a try, Smial, thanks for your feedback Poco a poco 10:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC)