File talk:Pasteur, Louis (1822-1895) par Paul Nadar.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

user:yann you need to provide some evidence that this photo is by paul nadar. otherwise you should more it back. burden is on you. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I provided the evidence in the move summary: File:Louis Pasteur by M.P. Nadar.jpg. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
no you did not. the source [1] has a credit "Nadar" it does not credit paul nadar. that is original research on your part. this is what you get when people overwrite files from difference sources. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 14:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please look again. The picture is signed M(onsieur) P(aul) Nadar. That's a fairly good evidence to me. A credit of "Nadar" alone doesn't prove anything. It is also the name of the studio/company. With a date of 1878, it could be Nadar, the father, or Paul Nadar, the son. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And this is a pretty clear and reliable reference. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
your later image proves multiple sittings by multiple photographers. Nadar was the father, the fact that the son pencil signed later does not change who took the photo of the carte de visite glass plate, which was then printed multiple times. you need to reflect the metadata of the source, and not introduce your own theories. and your "signed image" is not from the New York Public library, rather the overwriter did not provide a source for that image. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All these pictures are obviously made by the same photographer, around the same time. In the absence of evidence, you may be right. But here is one more, so I have 3 evidences, and you have none. Please stop digging... Regards, Yann (talk) 15:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should be added to the file, because that was the address of Paul Nadar Lotje (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but no. This category is for images depicting Rue d'Anjou. Otherwise we will have 1000s of irrelevant images in this category. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]