File talk:Languages with at least 50 million first-language speakers.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Для части макроязыков (китайский, арабский; но не персидский) данные, соответствующие приведенному источнику, были исключены автором иллюстрации. Таким образом список на иллюстрации одновременно не соответствует источнику (Individual languages that are members of a macrolanguage are not counted in the ranking) и не имеет единого принципа построения. Предлагаю привести иллюстрацию в соответствие с источником. --Шуфель (talk) 07:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This work doesn't treat macrolanguages (chinese, arabic) the same way that the source (Ethnologue) does. Approach "Individual languages that are members of a macrolanguage are not counted in the ranking" was broken. From the other hand, approach is inconsistent - macrolanguage "Persian [fas]" still appears. Please, fix according to source --Шуфель (talk) 06:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]