Commons:Valued image candidates/Wasserturm Luzern LCD.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wasserturm Luzern LCD.jpg

declined
Image
Nominated by Murdockcrc (talk) on 2011-01-18 20:14 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kapellbrücke, Lucerne
Used in Global usage
Reason Being perhaps one of the most photographed landmarks of Lucerne, it is a little bit ambitious of me to nominate this image as VI. However, checking the other images of Wasserturm in WikiMedia, I really think this one has a chance to be VI on this scope. For you to decide... -- Murdockcrc (talk)
Review
(criteria)

 Comment This general scope contains plenty of good images. I think that the nominated photo meets the scope: The Old Water Tower in Lucerne where it should compete with the great photos of the subject we can find here...--MrPanyGoff 11:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the input. The problem is that the category you suggest is "View of Pilatus from Lucerne", and on my image mount Pilatus is not visible. However, people can indeed find other great images of the Wasserturm on that category for sure. I will update the scope. --Murdockcrc (talk) 16:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I didn't suggest this category as a scope. I just found there many good images of this tower. The category in Commons we are talking about is not created yet. It should be created as a subcategory of Buildings in Lucerne and should be named after this tower if the tower has some name or just The Old Water Tower, Lucerne. Let others also give opinions for the scope. Just to mention (don't want to discourage you) but seeing the competitors I think that your photo has a little chance to win ;) --MrPanyGoff 17:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, you can create a valued review and add some more candidates, and so make the nomination even more interesting :-) Thanks for the feedback. --Murdockcrc (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
* So, as I've understood after reading some sources, the tower and the covered bridge are the main landmarks of this town. Furthermore, they are both treated as an inseparable ensemble that is called Kapellbrücke and it has a category in commons. So we can finalize the scope as Kapellbrücke, Lucerne... what do you think?--MrPanyGoff 22:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For the bridge scope, an image like File:6427_-_Luzern_-_Kapellbrücke.JPG with more bridge details might be preferrable. --Ikar.us (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scope changed from Wasserturm to The Old Water Tower in Lucerne --Murdockcrc (talk) 16:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".


Scores: 
1. Wasserturm Luzern LCD.jpg: +0
2. Luzern Kapellbruecke.jpg: +2
3. Luzern.jpg: +0 
=>
File:Wasserturm Luzern LCD.jpg: Declined.
File:Luzern Kapellbruecke.jpg: Promoted.
File:Luzern.jpg: Declined.
--George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]